Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116Media Influence and PoliticsPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsLaw, Rights, and Freedoms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“The Enemy of the People”: Populists and Press Freedom

Kenny, Paul D.·2020·Political Research Quarterly
DOI 10.1177/1065912918824038
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To what extent is populist rule associated with a decline in press freedom and freedom of expression? Populist rule refers to government headed by charismatic leaders who seek to gain and retain power by mobilizing mass constituencies that are typically free of other political attachments. Populism in this sense matters for two reasons: (1) controlling the media is a core objective of populists compared with other types of political leaders, who can rely on other organizational links to supporters; and (2) the interests of populist parties are virtually equivalent to the interests of party leaders, which means that populists face different time horizons and constraints on their behavior than the leaders of more deeply institutionalized parties. Using cross-national data on up to ninety-one countries from 1980 to 2014, this paper tests whether populist rule is associated with the erosion of press freedom and freedom of expression relative to other types of government and whether any effect is conditional on the ideology of the populist government in question. It finds that populist rule is associated with a decline in most measures of media freedom relative to programmatic party rule. However, this effect is lessened for right-leaning populist governments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1065912918824038

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kenny Paul D., 2017, Populism and Patronage: Why Populists Win Elections in India, Asia, and beyond
  2. Kenny Paul D., 2018, Paper presented at the World Congress of the International Political Science Association
  3. Przeworski Adam, 1999, Democracy’s Value, 23
  4. Valentini Marina. 2015. “The Impact of Party Orientation on Political Risk and Foreign Direct Investment Flows.” Senior Honors thesis, New York University.

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kenny, P. D.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Kenny, Paul D.
ORCID
Kenny, Paul D.
Venue
Political Research Quarterly
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2019-01-25
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
261-275
ISSN
  • 1065-9129 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-274X
DOI
10.1177/1065912918824038
OpenAlex
W2914675577
Cited by
98
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
19.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Political Research Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian National University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Law › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
Keywords
populism, freedom of the press, freedom of expression, populist governments, right-wing populism, left-wing populism, government ideology, media control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.