Cited by 12Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Development of the Ghent Multidimensional Somatic Complaints Scale

Open access
Beirens, Koen, Fontaine, Johnny R. J.·2010·Assessment

Abstract

The present study aimed at developing a new scale that operationalizes a hierarchical model of somatic complaints. First, 63 items representing a wide range of symptoms and sensations were compiled from somatic complaints scales and emotion literature. These complaints were rated by Belgian students (n = 307) and Belgian adults (n = 603). Exploratory factor analyses identified a gastrointestinal, cardiorespiratory, pain, temperature regulation, and fatigue factor. Next, the number of complaints was reduced to 18. Second, the short scale, called the Ghent Multidimensional Somatic Complaints Scale (GMSC), was administered to Belgian students (n = 735), Belgian adults (n = 664), and Turkish adults (n = 222). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that a higher-order model with five first-order and one second-order factor fitted best. Regression analyses demonstrated that the first-order factors were differentially related to anxiety, depression, anger, age, and gender. In sum, the GMSC scale offers the possibility to assess individual differences in somatic complaints from a hierarchical perspective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191109337187

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GMSCS is a validated instrument that assesses the presence and intensity of psychosomatic symptoms.

    “the Ghent Multidimensional Somatic Complaints Scale (GMSCS) [64], which assesses the presence and intensity of psychosomatic symptoms.”

    From Effects of the SmartACT Intervention on Motor and Psychological Variables in Adolescent Athletes: A Controlled Trial Using BlazePod and Microgate. (2025) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Measures section (p. 8) says respondents rate how often they experienced each somatic symptom in the past month, from “never” to “constantly.” The Discussion (pp. 14–16) describes the GMSC as a reliable screening tool for somatic complaints. This supports its use to assess symptom presence and frequency, but not the claim that it measures symptom intensity. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Deary, I. J. (1999). A taxonomy of medically unexplained symptoms. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 47, 51-59.
  2. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Eds.), Educational Measurement. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beirens, K., & Fontaine, J. R. J.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Beirens, Koen
Venue
Assessment
Published
2009-08-21
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
70-80
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2096342899
Cited by
12
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
somatic symptoms, scale development, gastrointestinal problems, pain, temperature regulation, fatigue, anxiety, depression, anger, individual differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Anxiety Disorders, Belgium, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Major Depressive Disorder, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Somatoform Disorders, Turkey, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review