Cited by 13Psychological Testing and AssessmentHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Do normative data from the full WCST extend to the abbreviated WCST?

Axelrod, Bradley N., Paolo, Anthony M., Abraham, Elizabeth·1997·Assessment

Abstract

The standard Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) was administered to a mixed clinical sample of 332 individuals. The full version was compared to the 64-card version (WCST-64) by extracting the results of the first 64 cards. Percent scores for the WCST were converted to standard scores using the normative data corrected for age and education level. Percent scores for WCST-64 were converted to standard scores using the same WCST normative data. WCST-64 scores were not comparable to those obtained from the full WCST. A breakdown of the data based on performance level found WCST-64 to be useful only with respondents obtaining five or more categories by the end of the first deck. The authors recommend caution in applying WCST manual data to the WCST-64 in the clinical setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/107319119700400105

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Axelrod, B. N., Paolo, A. M., & Abraham, E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Detroit, Michigan
  • University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Axelrod, Bradley N.
Venue
Assessment
Published
1997-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
41-46
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W1927273707
Cited by
13
References
12
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, reference values, test score comparability, standardization, clinical neuropsychological assessment, executive function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review