Mediating Uncertainty: Communicating the Financial Risks of Nanotechnologies
Abstract
The commercialization of nanotechnologies and the rapid development of hyperbole around their commercialization can provide a fertile field for research into how the potentials and expectations of an emerging technology are communicated to investors. As the commercialization of nanotechnologies intensifies, this area will grow in significance. This article explores how the financial potentials of nanotechnologies and the promise of high returns for investors are constructed by marketing professionals and mediated through financial media. Attention is focused on how the immense uncertainties that surround nanotech as a commercialized field are managed by scientists, marketers, public relations professionals, and journalists and on the communication strategies used to take advantage of the ambiguities of nanotech in order to translate the technologies into a profitable industry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Misrepresenting uncertainty is sometimes done to increase clarity and simplicity for uninitiated lay audiences.
“This is sometimes done to increase clarity and simplicity for uninitiated lay audiences (Ebeling, 2008)”
From A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020) · cites this paper as Ebeling, 2008
Cites
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019003001 · Cited by 10,847 · see citing works
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B. (1986) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 7,491 · see citing works
Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15881-2 · Cited by 3,981 · see citing works
Cetina, K. K. (1999) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674039681 · Cited by 3,950 · see citing works
Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality.
Gitlin, T., & Tuchman, G. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2065604 · Cited by 2,673 · see citing works
Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse.
Gieryn, T. F., Gilbert, N., & Mulkay, M. (1985) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070471 · Cited by 1,576 · see citing works
MacKenzie, D., & Millo, Y. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/374404 · Cited by 1,464 · see citing works
Callon, M., Méadel, C., & Rabeharisoa, V. (2002) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085140220123126 · Cited by 1,357 · see citing works
Making markets: opportunism and restraint on Wall Street
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1631 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs
Wynne, B. (2001) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505430120093586 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
(2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3012-9 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Shackley, S. J., & Wynne, B. (1996) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399602100302 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Broader Societal Issues of Nanotechnology
Roco, M. C. (2003) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1023/a:1025548512438 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Nisbet, M. C., & Mooney, C. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1142030 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
GASKELL, G. D., Eyck, T. T., Jackson, J., & Veltri, G. (2004) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662505048949 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Performing finance: the industry, the media and its image
Clark, G. L., Thrift, N. J., & Tickell, A. (2004) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290420001672813 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Scientific Work and Uncertainty
Star, S. L. (1985) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631285015003001 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Framing Effects on Public Opinion about Nanotechnology
Cobb, M. D. (2005) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547005281473 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
The Framing of Nanotechnologies in the British Newspaper Press
Anderson, A. G., Allan, S., Petersen, A. R., & Wilkinson, C. E. (2005) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547005281472 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
The Social and Economic Challenges of Nanotechnology
Wood, S., Geldart, A., & Jones, R. (2003) · TATuP Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis · doi:10.14512/tatup.12.3-4.72 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Certainty and the Public Understanding of Science: Science on Television1
Collins, H. M. (1987) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631287017004005 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Risk, science and policy: definitional struggles, information management, the media and BSE
Miller, D. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00163-x · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Governing at the nanoscale: people, policies and emerging technologies.
Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P., & Wilsdon, J. (2006) · Durham Research Online (Durham University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.5024.0169 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
News Narratives about Nano S&T in Major U.S. and Non-U.S. Newspapers
Stephens, L. F. (2005) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547005281520 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Nanotechnology: risks and the media
Friedman, S. M., & Egolf, B. P. (2005) · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine · doi:10.1109/mtas.2005.1563496 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Media effects and the question of the rational audience: lessons from the financial markets
Davis, A. (2006) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443706065035 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Kiernan, V. (2003) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769900308000410 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Information in the Marketplace: Media Explanations of the '87 Crash
Warner, K., & Molotch, H. L. (1993) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.1993.40.2.03x0324l · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Scientists' Representations of Uncertainty
(2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410601360-7 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Epistemology, Structure and Urgency: The Sociology of Financial and Scientific Journalists
Cooper, G., & Ebeling, M. F. E. (2007) · Sociological Research Online · doi:10.5153/sro.1558 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Retour sur la notion d’objet-frontière
Trompette, P., & Vinck, D. (2009) · Revue d anthropologie des connaissances · doi:10.3917/rac.006.0005 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662520942122 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Revisiting the notion of boundary object
Trompette, P., & Vinck, D. (2009) · Revue d anthropologie des connaissances · doi:10.3917/rac.006.0003 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Holden, P. A., Klaessig, F. C., Turco, R. F., Priester, J. H., Rico, C. M., Avila-Arias, H., Mortimer, M., Pacpaco, K., & Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es502440s · Cited by 194 · see citing works
The Effects of Uncertainty Frames in Three Science Communication Topics
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2019) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019870811 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Jensen, J. D., & Hurley, R. J. (2010) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662510387759 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Schäfer, M. S. (2011) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00373.x · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Communicating Scientific Uncertainty
Retzbach, A., & Maier, M. (2014) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650214534967 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Kaplan, S., & Radin, J. (2011) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312711402722 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology
Besley, J. C. (2010) · Emerging Health Threats Journal · doi:10.3402/ehtj.v3i0.7098 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Scientific Evidence and Science Journalism
Guenther, L., Bischoff, J., Löwe, A., Marzinkowski, H., & Voigt, M. (2017) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2017.1353432 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Guenther, L., & Ruhrmann, G. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662515625479 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Lehmkuhl, M., & Peters, H. P. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662516646047 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science
Covitt, B. A., & Anderson, C. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-022-00322-6 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Åm, H. (2013) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/sct054 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Heidmann, I., & Milde, J. (2013) · Environmental Sciences Europe · doi:10.1186/2190-4715-25-25 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The Social and Economic Impacts of Nanotechnologies: A Literature Review
Seear, K., Petersen, A. R., & Bowman, D. M. (2009) · Cited by 24 · see citing works
van Broekhuizen, P., & Reijnders, L. (2011) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01615.x · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Scientists’ Perception of Ethical Issues in Nanomedicine: A Case Study
Costa, H. S., Sethe, S. C., Pêgo, A. P., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2011) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm.11.9 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flemming, D., Creß, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2017) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547017738091 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
In Search of Immortality: The Political Economy of Anti-aging Medicine
Petersen, A. R., & Seear, K. (2009) · Medicine Studies · doi:10.1007/s12376-009-0020-x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
RISK SOCIETY, MEDIA, AND POWER: THE CASE OF NANOTECHNOLOGY
Fitzgerald, S. T., & Rubin, B. A. (2010) · Sociological Spectrum · doi:10.1080/02732171003641016 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Cutcliffe, S. H., Pense, C. M., & Zvalaren, M. (2012) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-012-0149-z · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Eisler, M. (2013) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-013-9224-z · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A Meta-Analysis Synthesizing the Effects of Three Uncertainty Types in Science Communication
Zaifu, G., Liu, K., & Chen, M. (2025) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470251314129 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The role of expectations, hype and ethics in neuroimaging and neuromodulation futures
Rusconi, E., & Mitchener-Nissen, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00214 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies
Åm, T. G. (2010) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0105-8 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Guenther, L., Froehlich, K., & Ruhrmann, G. (2015) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699014559500 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Market Considerations for Nanomedicines and Theranostic Nanomedicines
Alexander, A. A., & Jotterand, F. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407722-5.00025-6 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Mesmer, K. R., Jahng, M. R., Wurm, J., & Akhther, N. (2024) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470241261337 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The Korean press and Hwang’s fraud
Park, J., Jeon, H., & Logan, R. A. (2009) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662508096779 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Fu, M., Yang, K., & Fujigaki, Y. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448221149747 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Meadows, R. P., Brunton‐Smith, I., & Ellis, J. G. (2022) · Sleep Health · doi:10.1016/j.sleh.2022.05.001 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Regreso sobre la noción de objeto frontera
Trompette, P., & Vinck, D. (2009) · Revue d anthropologie des connaissances · doi:10.3917/rac.006.0004 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A Computer-Aided Affective Content Analysis of Nanotechnology Newspaper Articles
Davis, R. E. L. (2011) · NanoEthics · doi:10.1007/s11569-011-0129-8 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Imagining Technology-Mediated Social Change? A Critique of the Theory of Sociotechnical Imaginaries
Arboledas-Lérida, L. (2025) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-025-09622-x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Rocci, A., & Raimondo, C. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781119240822.ch26 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Fian, L., Vaupotič, N., Richter, I., Koelmans, A. A., & Pahl, S. (2026) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625251410494 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Transactional Arrangements in the Governance of Emerging Technologies: The Case of Nanotechnology
Kica, E., & Wessel, R. A. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315379593-10 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The “bread and butter” of science: understanding how scientists communicate uncertainties
Roney, C., Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-07026-0 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Fu, M., Yang, K., & Fujigaki, Y. (2023) · East Asian Science Technology and Society An International Journal · doi:10.1080/18752160.2022.2148329 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hong, S. J. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-49084-2_6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
News about nanotechnology : a longitudinal framing analysis of newspaper reporting on nanotechnology
Thompson, S. (2011) · Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Nanotechnology and health: From boundary object to bodily intervention
Perry, K.-M. E. (2010) · Summit (Simon Fraser University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Globalization and Emerging Technologies: The Example of Nanotechnology
Puri, I. K. (2015)
Ebeling, M. F. E. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-50221-6_1
Self-citationEducational Inequities and the Distribution of Technical Knowledge: Three Instruments
Slaton, A. E. (2023) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14648.003.0012
Lei, J., Huang, Z., & Deng, Y. (2026) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-026-00737-5
Augsburg, F. I., Prochazka, F., Thomm, E., & Bauer, J. (2026) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625261484418
- Authors
- Ebeling, M. F. E.
- Affiliations
- Drexel University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ebeling, Mary F. E.
- ORCID
- Ebeling, Mary F. E.
- Venue
- Science Communication
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 335-361
- ISSN
- 0164-0259 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-5470
- 1552-8545
- OpenAlex
- W2160799914
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Keywords
- nanotechnology commercialization, uncertainty management, investor communication, financial media, science marketing, public relations, science journalism, hype, emerging technologies, communication strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review