Cited by 49Nanotechnology research and applicationsRisk Perception and ManagementMedia Studies and Communication

Mediating Uncertainty: Communicating the Financial Risks of Nanotechnologies

Ebeling, Mary F. E.·2008·Science Communication

Abstract

The commercialization of nanotechnologies and the rapid development of hyperbole around their commercialization can provide a fertile field for research into how the potentials and expectations of an emerging technology are communicated to investors. As the commercialization of nanotechnologies intensifies, this area will grow in significance. This article explores how the financial potentials of nanotechnologies and the promise of high returns for investors are constructed by marketing professionals and mediated through financial media. Attention is focused on how the immense uncertainties that surround nanotech as a commercialized field are managed by scientists, marketers, public relations professionals, and journalists and on the communication strategies used to take advantage of the ambiguities of nanotech in order to translate the technologies into a profitable industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1075547007312068

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Misrepresenting uncertainty is sometimes done to increase clarity and simplicity for uninitiated lay audiences.

    “This is sometimes done to increase clarity and simplicity for uninitiated lay audiences (Ebeling, 2008)”

    From A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020) · cites this paper as Ebeling, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebeling, M. F. E.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Ebeling, Mary F. E.
Venue
Science Communication
Published
2008-03
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
335-361
ISSN
  • 0164-0259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-5470
  • 1552-8545
OpenAlex
W2160799914
Cited by
49
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Science Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
nanotechnology commercialization, uncertainty management, investor communication, financial media, science marketing, public relations, science journalism, hype, emerging technologies, communication strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review