The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient-Centered Care and Outcomes: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract
Patient-centered care (PCC) has been studied for several decades. Yet a clear definition of PCC is lacking, as is an understanding of how specific PCC processes relate to patient outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the PCC literature to examine the evidence for PCC and outcomes. Three databases were searched for all years through September 2012. We retained 40 articles for the analysis. Results found mixed relationships between PCC and clinical outcomes, that is, some studies found significant relationships between specific elements of PCC and outcomes but others found no relationship. There was stronger evidence for positive influences of PCC on satisfaction and self-management. Future research should examine specific dimensions of PCC and how they relate to technical care quality, particularly some dimensions that have not been studied extensively. Future research also should identify moderating and mediating variables in the PPC–outcomes relationship.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some things that need to be considered before carrying out an exercise program for cancer survivors are conditions that may be contraindicated, such as fever, bone metastases involving 25% of the cortex, and the patient's laboratory results. If the patient is receiving chemotherapy or experiencing a recurrence, high impact aerobic exercise is contraindicated [72]; this is also true if the labor”
From Empowerment in the treatment of fatigue in breast cancer patients (2021) · cites this paper as [72]
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Baker, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1192 · Cited by 10,779
Donabedian, A. (1988) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.260.12.1743 · Cited by 5,895
Kushner (2021) · doi:10.12788/jfp · Cited by 3,799
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Bloom, B. S. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.5.646-a · Cited by 3,733
The Journal of Family Practice
Geyman, J. P. (1997) · American Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1080/01926189708251066 · Cited by 3,088
Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature
Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00098-8 · Cited by 2,993
The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.
Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., DONNER, A. P., McWhinney, I. R., Oates, J., Weston, W. W., & Jordan, J. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 2,508
Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?
Eh, W. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 2,095
Glaser, E. (1972) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197210192871623 · Cited by 970
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033 · DOI · Paper page
- Rathert C., 2012, Health Expectations.
- *Stewart M., 2000, Journal of Family Practice, 49, 796
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to practice person‐centred care: A conceptual framework
Santana, M., Manalili, K., Jolley, R., Zelinsky, S., Quan, H., & Lu, M. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12640 · Cited by 1,103
An Integrative Model of Patient-Centeredness – A Systematic Review and Concept Analysis
Scholl, I., Zill, J. M., Härter, M. C., & Dirmaier, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107828 · Cited by 784
Multimorbidity and quality of life: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Makovski, T. T., Schmitz, S., Zeegers, M. P., Stranges, S., & van den Akker, M. (2019) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2019.04.005 · Cited by 722
Park, M., Giap, T., Lee, M., Jeong, H. C., Jeong, M., & Go, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.006 · Cited by 502
Kuipers, S. J., Cramm, J. M., & Nieboer, A. P. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3818-y · Cited by 418
Metadata
- Authors
- Rathert, C., Wyrwich, M. D., & Boren, S. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Venue
- Medical Care Research and Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-11-20
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 351-379
- ISSN
- 1077-5587 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6801
- OpenAlex
- W2159318017
- Cited by
- 1,087
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Care Research and Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Keywords
- patient-centered care, patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, self-management, clinical outcomes, quality of care
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Patient-Centered Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
