The prevention of child maltreatment through the nurse family partnership program: Mediating effects in a long-term follow-up study
Abstract
We examine maternal life-course mediators of the impact of a nurse home visitation program on reducing child maltreatment among participants in the Elmira trial of the Nurse Family Partnership program from the first child’s birth through age 15. For women having experienced low to moderate levels of domestic violence, program effects on the number of confirmed maltreatment reports were mediated by reductions in numbers of subsequent children born to mothers and their reported use of public assistance. Together, the two mediators explained nearly one half of the total effect of nurse home visiting on child maltreatment. The long-term success of this program on reducing child maltreatment can be explained, at least in part, by its positive effect on pregnancy planning and economic self-sufficiency.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A follow-up mediation analysis underscored the stabilizing role of enhanced family planning and improved income through public assistance in the relationship between the Nurse-Family Partnership and reduced rates of child maltreatment.
“A follow-up mediation analysis on the relationship between the intervention and reduced rates of child maltreatment underscored the stabilizing role of enhanced family planning and improved income through public assistance.69”
From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 91
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy, the exercise of control
- 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1129836 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.413 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1080/00332747.1993.11024624 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.06.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.08.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.284.11.1385 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2005-0948 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2005-1517 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511752810 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61706-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Gomby D., 2005, Home visitation in 2005: Outcomes for children and parents
- 10.2307/1602719 · DOI
- 10.1353/foc.0.0032 · DOI
- Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, 2014, New directions in child abuse and neglect research
- 10.1001/jama.1997.03550080054039 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.283.15.1983 · DOI
- 10.1177/0193841X9301700202 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61708-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2135939 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11121-015-0572-9 · DOI
- Muthen L. K., 1998, Mplus users guide
- 10.1001/jama.1997.03550080047038 · DOI · Paper page
- Olds D. L., 1986, Pediatrics, 78, 65, 10.1542/peds.78.1.65 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.280.14.1238 · DOI · Paper page
- Olds D. L., 1994, Pediatrics, 93, 89, 10.1542/peds.93.1.89 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.78.11.1436 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199701)25:1<9::AID-JCOP2>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01702.x · DOI · Paper page
- Paulsell D., 2010, Home visiting evidence of effectiveness review: Executive summary
- 10.1080/00273170701341316 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.childyouth.2003.11.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11121-015-0611-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.03.004 · DOI
- Sedlak A. J., 2010, Fourth National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS–4): Report to Congress, Executive Summary
- 10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.368 · DOI
- 10.2307/351733 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00750.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.019 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13428-011-0076-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1602723 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0954579409000248 · DOI
- Authors
- Eckenrode, J., Campa, M. I., Morris, P. A., Henderson, C. R., Bolger, K. E., Kitzman, H., & Olds, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- New York University (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eckenrode, John
- Venue
- Child Maltreatment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-12-29
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 92-99
- ISSN
- 1077-5595 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6119
- OpenAlex
- W2606569623
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Maltreatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- Nurse-Family Partnership, child abuse prevention, nurse home visiting, mediation analysis, domestic violence, pregnancy planning
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, House Calls, Humans, Infant, Public Assistance, Program Evaluation, Domestic Violence, Family Nursing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review