Cited by 244Child Abuse and TraumaChild Welfare and AdoptionIntimate Partner and Family Violence

Individual Cognitive Behavioral Treatment and Family Therapy for Physically Abused Children and their Offending Parents: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

Kolko, David J.·1996·Child Maltreatment

Abstract

Few studies have evaluated short-term psychosocial treatments with physically abused school-aged children and their offending parents or families. This study compares the treatment outcomes of 55 cases that were randomly assigned to individual child and parent cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or family therapy (FT) with those who received routine community services (RCS). Measures of child, parent, and family dysfunction and adjustment were collected from both participants and supplemented with official social service records to evaluate the efficacy of treatment through 1-year follow-up. Compared with RCS, CBT and FT were associated with improvements in child-to-parent violence and child externalizing behavior, parental distress and abuse risk, and family conflict and cohesion. All three conditions reported several improvements across time. One parent participant each in CBT and FT and three in RCS were found to have engaged in another incident of physical maltreatment after treatment had begun. No differences between CBT and FT were observed on consumer satisfaction or maltreatment risk ratings at termination. The findings of this evaluation provide additional support for the continued development and evaluation of individual and family treatments involving child victims of physical abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077559596001004004

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Family systems behavioral therapies have repeatedly shown better outcomes for parents referred because of physical child abuse.

    “Family systems oriented behavioral therapies examined in the few randomized controlled trials that have been conducted have consistently demonstrated improved outcomes in parents referred for child physical abuse (Chaffin et al., 2004; Kolko, 1996; Swenson, Schaeffer, Henggeler, Faldowski, & Mayhew, 2010).”
  • Mothers of non-drug exposed children had relatively older children who were in the age range typically targeted in parent training child management programs for physical abuse.

    “Mothers of non-drug exposed children also had relatively older children who were in the age range typically targeted in parent training child management programs for physical abuse (Chaffin et al., 2004; Kolko, 1996; Swenson, Schaeffer, Henggeler, Faldowski, & Mayhew, 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kolko, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kolko, David J.
Venue
Child Maltreatment
Published
1996-11
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
322-342
ISSN
  • 1077-5595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6119
OpenAlex
W2027285890
Cited by
244
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Child Maltreatment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
child physical abuse, cognitive behavioral therapy, family therapy, child abuse victims, parental abuse, externalizing problems, parental distress, abuse risk, family conflict, family cohesion, treatment efficacy, community service, customer satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review