The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Influence of Knowledge and Deference toward Scientific Authority: A Media Effects Model for Public Attitudes toward Nanotechnology
Abstract
Previous research suggests both cognitive and affective variables can impact how the public thinks about new scientific developments such as nanotechnology. Most studies have not explored the origins of these variables or their simultaneous, interactive influences on public opinion. Using national telephone survey data (N=706), we examine the pathways between different types of media use and attitudes toward nanotechnology, particularly potential mediating roles of nanotechnology knowledge and deference toward scientific authority. People relying on newspapers and the Internet for science information report higher levels of nanotechnology knowledge, while respondents using science TV showed higher levels of deference toward scientific authority.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An individual's deference to, and trust in, science is associated with responses to science communication in general (e.g., Anderson et al., 2011;Lee and Scheufele, 2006).”
From A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020) · cites this paper as Lee and Scheufele, 2006
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Nasty Effect: Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies
Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D., Xenos, M., & Ladwig, P. J. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009 · Cited by 716
Self-citationTrust in Risk Management: A Model‐Based Review of Empirical Research
Earle, T. C. (2010) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01398.x · Cited by 455
A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662520942122 · Cited by 291
Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States
Scheufele, D. A., Corley, E. A., Shih, T.-J., Dalrymple, K. E., & Ho, S. S. (2008) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.361 · Cited by 232
Self-citationCommunicating science in social settings
Scheufele, D. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1213275110 · Cited by 231
Self-citationThe Effects of Uncertainty Frames in Three Science Communication Topics
Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2019) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019870811 · Cited by 151
Zhao, X., Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., & Roser‐Renouf, C. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01563.x · Cited by 161
Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr032 · Cited by 122
Self-citationTaddicken, M., & Neverla, I. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-22145-4_2 · Cited by 119
Rabinovich, A., & Morton, T. A. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01771.x · Cited by 114
Takahashi, B., & Tandoc, E. C. (2015) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662515574986 · Cited by 112
Cui, D., & Wu, F. (2019) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666919893411 · Cited by 106
Brechman, J., Lee, C.-J., & Cappella, J. N. (2009) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547009332649 · Cited by 99
Self-citationHo, S. S., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2010) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-010-0038-8 · Cited by 103
Self-citationCommunicating Scientific Uncertainty
Retzbach, A., & Maier, M. (2014) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650214534967 · Cited by 95
Climate Change From the User’s Perspective
Taddicken, M. (2013) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000080 · Cited by 89
Ladwig, P. J., Dalrymple, K. E., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2012) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scs048 · Cited by 77
Self-citationYeo, S. K., Cacciatore, M. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Runge, K. K., Su, L. Y.-F., Kim, J., Xenos, M. A., & Corley, E. A. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.061 · Cited by 73
Self-citationOpposing ends of the spectrum: Exploring trust in scientific and religious authorities
Cacciatore, M. A., Browning, N., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., Xenos, M. A., & Corley, E. A. (2018) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662516661090 · Cited by 70
Self-citationKim, S., Tanner, A. H., Friedman, D. B., Foster, C. B., & Bergeron, C. D. (2013) · Journal of Community Health · doi:10.1007/s10900-013-9798-2 · Cited by 64
Retzbach, A., Marschall, J., Rahnke, M., Otto, L., & Maier, M. (2011) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0582-x · Cited by 60
Public views about editing genes in wildlife for conservation
Kohl, P. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2019) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13310 · Cited by 61
Self-citationMedia Use, Interpersonal Communication, and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence
Brewer, P. R., Bingaman, J., Paintsil, A., Wilson, D. C., & Dawson, W. (2022) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470221130307 · Cited by 55
Taddicken, M., Reif, A., & Hoppe, I. (2018) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.17030201 · Cited by 55
Tweeting nano: how public discourses about nanotechnology develop in social media environments
Runge, K. K., Yeo, S. K., Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., Xenos, M. A., Anderson, A. A., Choi, D.-H., Kim, J., Li, N., et al. (2013) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-012-1381-8 · Cited by 54
Self-citationHowell, E. L., Wirz, C. D., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Xenos, M. A. (2020) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662520962741 · Cited by 54
Self-citationBogert, J. M., Buczny, J., Harvey, J. A., & Ellers, J. (2023) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2023.2280749 · Cited by 63
Science TV News Exposure Predicts Science Beliefs
Hwang, Y., & Southwell, B. G. (2009) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650209338912 · Cited by 52
Yuan, S., Besley, J. C., & Dudo, A. D. (2018) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662518797002 · Cited by 52
Kim, J., Yeo, S. K., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Xenos, M. A. (2013) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12141 · Cited by 51
Self-citationLiang, X., Ho, S. S., Brossard, D., Xenos, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., Anderson, A. A., Xiaoming, H., & He, X. (2013) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662513510858 · Cited by 50
Self-citationInformal Learning Through Science Media Usage
Maier, M., Rothmund, T., Retzbach, A., Otto, L., & Besley, J. C. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.916215 · Cited by 58
Dahlstrom, M. F., Dudo, A. D., & Brossard, D. (2011) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01641.x · Cited by 47
Reif, A., & Guenther, L. (2021) · Journal of Trust Research · doi:10.1080/21515581.2022.2075373 · Cited by 59
van Dijk, H., Fischer, A. R. H., Marvin, H. J. P., & van Trijp, J. C. M. (2015) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1057198 · Cited by 44
Distorting Genetic Research About Cancer: From Bench Science to Press Release to Published News
Brechman, J. M., Lee, C., & Cappella, J. N. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01550.x · Cited by 44
Self-citationAkin, H., Yeo, S. K., Wirz, C. D., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., Xenos, M. A., & Corley, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Responsible Innovation · doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1495026 · Cited by 42
Self-citationVećkalov, B., van Stekelenburg, A., van Harreveld, F., & Rutjens, B. T. (2023) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470231184203 · Cited by 40
Binder, A. R., Hillback, E. D., & Brossard, D. (2016) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12462 · Cited by 38
Chuah, A. S. F., Leong, A. D., Cummings, C. L., & Ho, S. S. (2018) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-018-4126-5 · Cited by 38
Haupt, M. R., Li, J., & Mackey, T. K. (2021) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/20539517211013843 · Cited by 36
Ho, S. S., Leow, V. J. X., & Leung, Y. W. (2020) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.03.019 · Cited by 34
Bingaman, J., Brewer, P. R., Paintsil, A., & Wilson, D. C. (2021) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547021998069 · Cited by 31
Lee, E. W. J., & Ho, S. S. (2015) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-015-3036-z · Cited by 30
van Giesen, R. I., Fischer, A. R. H., & van Trijp, J. C. M. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662516661292 · Cited by 28
“We Begin Tonight With Fruits and Vegetables”
Nucci, M. L., & Kubey, R. W. (2007) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547007308173 · Cited by 28
Why People Who Know Less Think They Know about COVID-19: Evidence from US and Singapore
Lee, S., Yamamoto, M., & Tandoc, E. C. (2021) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990211049460 · Cited by 27
How we talk when we talk about nano: The future in laypeople's talk
Davies, S. R. (2010) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.07.003 · Cited by 27
Mede, N. G. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01058-y · Cited by 24
Protection Motivation and Communication through Nanofood Labels
Cummings, C. L., Chuah, A. S. F., & Ho, S. S. (2018) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243917753991 · Cited by 23
Jelinski, L., Etzrodt, K., & Engesser, S. (2021) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.20040202 · Cited by 20
How Might Adults Learn About New Science and Technology? The Case of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Gilbert, J. K., & Lin, H. (2012) · International Journal of Science Education Part B · doi:10.1080/21548455.2012.736035 · Cited by 20
Stimulating Upstream Engagement: An Experimental Study of Nanotechnology Information Seeking
Xenos, M. A., Becker, A. B., Anderson, A., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00814.x · Cited by 20
Self-citationLee, E. W. J., & Ho, S. S. (2018) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699017741090 · Cited by 19
Accessing Science Through Media
Burakgazi, S. G., & Yıldırım, A. (2013) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547013505847 · Cited by 17
Mapping Neuroscientists’ Perceptions of the Nature and Effects of Public Visibility
Koh, E. J., Dunwoody, S., Brossard, D., & Allgaier, J. (2016) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547016635180 · Cited by 17
Who do UK consumers trust for information about nanotechnology?
Erdem, S. (2018) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.04.008 · Cited by 16
Runge, K. K., Brossard, D., & Xenos, M. A. (2018) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1513854 · Cited by 15
Taddicken, M., & Wolff, L. (2023) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2023.2239516 · Cited by 15
Nucci, M. L., & Hallman, W. K. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118886373.ch3 · Cited by 13
Brossard, D. (2012) · Acatech-Diskussion · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33994-3_15 · Cited by 13
Taddicken, M., Kohout, S., & Hoppe, I. (2019) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1561483 · Cited by 12
Disgusting microbes: The effect of disgust on perceptions of risks related to modifying microbiomes
Yeo, S. K., Sun, Y., McKasy, M., & Shugart, E. C. (2019) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662519832200 · Cited by 13
Butkowski, O. K., Baum, C. M., Pakseresht, A., Bröring, S., & Lagerkvist, C. J. (2019) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101308 · Cited by 14
Framing Affects Support for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in the United States
Palm, R. I., Kingsland, J. T., & Bolsen, T. (2025) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470251317172 · Cited by 14
What’s in a name? How we define nanotech shapes public reactions
Anderson, A. A., Kim, J., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Xenos, M. A. (2013) · Journal of Nanoparticle Research · doi:10.1007/s11051-013-1421-z · Cited by 14
Self-citationRobinson-Tay, K., & Peng, W. (2024) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2024.2360923 · Cited by 10
Eyes on the Streets: Media Use and Public Opinion About Facial Recognition Technology
Brewer, P. R., Bingaman, J., Dawson, W., Paintsil, A., & Wilson, D. C. (2022) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/02704676221148103 · Cited by 8
Guenther, L., & Joubert, M. (2018) · African Journal of Science Technology Innovation and Development · doi:10.1080/20421338.2017.1399535 · Cited by 8
Public responses to scientific research: Does disciplinary attribution matter?
Scheitle, C. P., & Guthrie, S. K. (2018) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662518814365 · Cited by 8
Media use and US Attitudes Toward Government and Private Space Exploration
Bingaman, J., Dawson, W., Brewer, P. R., & Paintsil, A. (2022) · Space Policy · doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101506 · Cited by 7
Stewart, C. O., McConnell, J. R., & Dickerson, D. L. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education Part B · doi:10.1080/21548455.2016.1157644 · Cited by 7
How Scientific Evidence Links Attitudes to Behaviors
Druckman, J. N., & Bolsen, T. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511988554.006 · Cited by 7
Crude comments and concern: Online incivility's effect on risk perceptions of emerging technologies
Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011) · Cited by 6
Self-citationOperationalizing science literacy: an experimental analysis of measurement
McKasy, M., Cacciatore, M. A., Su, L. Y.-F., Yeo, S. K., & O’Neill, L. (2020) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.19040203 · Cited by 6
Ho, S. S., Tan, W.-D., Chuah, A. S. F., Chua, P., Lau, K. X. L., & Chan, J. Z. A. (2022) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2051577 · Cited by 7
Developing the Human and Physical Infrastructure for Nanoscale Science and Engineering
Murday, J. S., Hersam, M. C., Chang, R. P. H., Fonash, S., & Bell, L. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1168-6_13 · Cited by 6
Scheufele, D. A., & Dudo, A. D. (2010) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2010.11679099 · Cited by 6
Self-citationChionas, G., & Emvalotis, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.933288 · Cited by 7
Fictional scenarios, real concerns: science fiction and perceptions of human genome editing
Eichmeier, A. A., Bao, L., Xenos, M. A., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2023) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.22010208 · Cited by 7
Self-citationLi, L., & Song, C. (2024) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ad61c2 · Cited by 4
Norman, M. L. P., Blessing, J. N., & Myrick, J. G. (2025) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2025.2565583 · Cited by 3
Nanotechnology as a Tool for Science and Scientific Literacy
LeBlanc, S. (2019) · Women in engineering and science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19951-7_2 · Cited by 3
Youtie, J., Carley, S. F., Philip Shapira, A., Corley, E. A., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.3152/095820211x13176484436014 · Cited by 3
Self-citationEffects of Educational News Stories on the Beliefs of Taiwanese Teacher Education Students
Liu, S.-H. (2014) · Asia-Pacific social science review · doi:10.59588/2350-8329.1032 · Cited by 2
Internet as a context: Exploring its impacts on scientific optimism in China
Luo, C., Shang, J., & Zhu, Y. (2020) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666920965638 · Cited by 2
University attendance as science communication
Zahry, N. R., & Besley, J. C. (2021) · International Journal of Science Education Part B · doi:10.1080/21548455.2021.1917014 · Cited by 2
Anderson, K.-A., Nowak, G. J., Cacciatore, M. A., Rohani, P., & Drake, J. M. (2025) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127804 · Cited by 1
Gómez-Ferri, J., Escalante, J. M. D. C., & Goig, R. L. (2014) · Arbor · doi:10.3989/arbor.2014.766n2015 · Cited by 1
Jacobs, D. B. (2016) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-738-2_11 · Cited by 1
Biotechnologie-Kommunikation Kontroversen, Analysen, Aktivitäten
Weitze, M., Wess, G., Weingart, P., Renn, O., Müller-Röber, B., Heckl, W. M., & Pühler, A. (2012) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33994-3 · Cited by 1
Policy Innovation for an Uncertain Future: Regulating Drone Use in Southern California Cities
Nelson, J. R. (2019) · Cited by 1
Examining the Role of Mobile Media in Public Engagement with GMO Foods Among Chinese Consumers
Wen, N., Xiaoming, H., & Han, X. (2016) · Mobile communication in Asia · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0917-8_6 · Cited by 1
Framing Nano: Media Coverage and Public Opinion about Nanotechnology
Gorss, J. (2008) · eCommons (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Consumer perceptions of nanomaterials in functional foods
Hallman, W., & Nucci, M. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118462157.ch20 · Cited by 2
News about nanotechnology : a longitudinal framing analysis of newspaper reporting on nanotechnology
Thompson, S. (2011) · Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) · Cited by 1
Implicaciones periodísticas del contexto online en la comunicación de la ciencia
González-Pedraz, C. (2018) · doi:10.35376/10324/38550 · Cited by 1
Bogert, J. M. (2024) · doi:10.5463/thesis.997 · Cited by 2
Gómez-Ferri, J., Cózar, J. M., Escalante, & Goig, R. L. (2014)
Yang, X., Song, B., Sun, J., & Wei, R. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4779026
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, C.-J., & Scheufele, D. A.
- Venue
- Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 819-834
- ISSN
- 1077-6990 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-430X
- OpenAlex
- W2026798544
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › General Materials Science › Nanotechnology research and applications
- Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
- Keywords
- nanotechnology, public attitudes toward science, scientific authority, deference to experts, scientific knowledge, media influence, science communication, newspapers, science television, internet use, public opinion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
