Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 45Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsIndigenous and Place-Based Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Reciprocity: Responses to Critiques of Indigenous Methodologies

Windchief, Sweeney, Polacek, Cheryl, Munson, Michael, Ulrich, Mary, Cummins, Jason D.·2018·Qualitative Inquiry

Abstract

This article will examine and respond to significant critiques of Indigenous research methodologies as part of an Indigenous Methodologies in Educational Research course at a midsized public university in the intermountain west. The authors will present their perspectives in response to critiques of Indigenous research methodologies as presented at the American Indigenous Research Association’s annual meeting in October of 2014. This collection of responses is offered in an effort to facilitate an interactive dialogue with scholars who use Indigenous research methodologies applicable to multiple fields of study, support scholarship that is responsive to the needs of Indigenous communities, and ultimately center relevant research design and findings within Indigenous paradigms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077800417743527

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.59962/9780774855440 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5771-7 · DOI
  3. 10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.33 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Battiste M., 2011, Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision
  5. Bennett J. M., 2008, Developing intercultural competence and transformation: Theory, research, and application in international education, 13
  6. 10.1086/670959 · DOI
  7. Brayboy B. M. J., 2012, Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs, 423
  8. 10.1080/03057925.2012.706453 · DOI
  9. 10.5204/ijcis.v4i2.62 · DOI
  10. Castiano J., 2014, Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems, 13, 28
  11. 10.1080/09518390500298170 · DOI
  12. Chilisa B., 2012, Indigenous research methodologies
  13. Creswell J. W., 2013, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches
  14. Crosby M., 2002, Academic reading: Reading and writing across the disciplines, 488
  15. 10.1353/cp.2002.0046 · DOI
  16. Gone J. P., 2014, Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the American Indigenous Research Association held at the Salish Kootenai College in Pablo, MT
  17. 10.1080/095183900413296 · DOI
  18. Grande S., 2004, Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought
  19. 10.1037/a0032595 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1353/aiq.2004.0099 · DOI
  21. Kirkness V. J., 2001, Journal of American Indian Education, 30, 1
  22. Klug B. J., 2012, Standing together: American Indian education as culturally relevant pedagogy, 71, 10.5771/9781610487870 · DOI
  23. Klug B. J., 2012, Standing together: American Indian Education as culturally relevant pedagogy, 10.5771/9781610487870 · DOI
  24. 10.7202/1069060ar · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kovach M., 2013, Indigenous methodologies
  26. Lambert L., 2014, Research for Indigenous survival: Indigenous research methodologies in the behavioral sciences
  27. LaVeaux D., 2009, Pimatisiwin, 7, 1
  28. 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00443.x · DOI
  29. 10.7202/1069061ar · DOI
  30. 10.3102/0013189X030005006 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5771-7 · DOI
  32. Sium A., 2013, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2, 1
  33. Smith L. T., 2013, Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples
  34. 10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Tuck E., 2012, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1, 1
  36. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2014, Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all
  37. 10.1046/j.1440-1584.2000.00304.x · DOI
  38. wa Thiong’o N, 1981, Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literatures
  39. Wilson S., 2001, Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25, 175
  40. Wilson S., 2008, Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods
  41. Woolman D. C., 2001, International Education Journal, 2, 27
  42. Writer J. H., 2012, Standing together: American Indian education as culturally relevant pedagogy, 55

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Windchief, S., Polacek, C., Munson, M., Ulrich, M., & Cummins, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Montana State University (US)
  • Montana State University, Bozeman, USA
  • Salish Kootenai College (US)
  • New Mexico State University (US)
Corresponding author
Windchief, Sweeney
Venue
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2017-12-11
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
532-542
ISSN
  • 1077-8004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7565
OpenAlex
W2774334377
Cited by
45
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Qualitative Inquiry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
Keywords
Indigenous research methodologies, reciprocity, Indigenous paradigms, indigenous peoples, research design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review