Cited by 93Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceFamily and Matrimonial LawFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Children in the Crossfire: Child Custody Determinations Among Couples With a History of Intimate Partner Violence

Kernic, Mary A., Monary-Ernsdorff, Daphne J., Koepsell, Jennifer K., Holt, Victoria L.·2005·Violence Against Women

Abstract

Although most states mandate considerations of intimate partner violence (IPV) in child custody proceedings, little is known about how often a preexisting history of IPV is effectively presented to the courts in dissolution cases and, when it is, what effect it has on child custody and visitation outcomes. This retrospective cohort study examined the effects of a history of IPV, further categorized by whether substantiation of that history existed and whether the court handling the custody proceedings knew of that history, on child custody and visitation outcomes. The findings from this study highlight several issues of concern regarding the reality of child custody among families with a history of IPV. These include two primary concerns: a lack of identification of IPV even among cases with a documented, substantiated history, and a lack of strong protections being ordered even among cases in which a history of substantiated IPV is known to exist.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801205278042

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal and child deaths are associated with custody disputes and contact arrangements.

    “Maternal and child deaths are associated with custody disputes and contact arrangements (Holt, 2015; Kernic et al., 2005).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Kernic et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kernic, M. A., Monary-Ernsdorff, D. J., Koepsell, J. K., & Holt, V. L.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Violence Against Women
Published
2005-08
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
991-1021
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
OpenAlex
W2119122310
Cited by
93
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Law › Family and Matrimonial Law
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
intimate partner violence, child custody, visitation, divorce, child protection, domestic violence
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Behavior, Child Custody, Psychology, Child, Child Welfare, Divorce, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Retrospective Studies, Spouse Abuse, Washington, Cohort Studies, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review