Cited by 157Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentElder Abuse and Neglect

“Paper Abuse”: When All Else Fails, Batterers Use Procedural Stalking

Miller, Susan L., Smolter, Nicole L.·2011·Violence Against Women

Abstract

Using data from in-depth interviews with women who have exited violent relationships, attorneys, and practitioners/policy specialists, this research note explores the continuation of control as women encounter "paper abuse." The barrage of men's frivolous lawsuits, false reports of child abuse, and other system-related manipulations exerts power, forces contact, and financially burdens their ex-partners. Although these acts are not new, the significance of this continuing abuse has not been fully explored by researchers. Yet attorneys and practitioners recognize the need for better documentation to strengthen protections for women still forced to contend with their former batterers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801211407290

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Miller and Smolter labelled 'paper abuse' or 'procedural stalking' in their qualitative study with ten women; these actions include making false reports to child welfare authorities, frivolous lawsuits, and strategies to extend court proceedings.

    “This subset of legal post-separation coercive tactics includes what Miller and Smolter (2011) labelled “paper abuse” or “procedural stalking” in their qualitative study with ten women. These actions include making false reports to child welfare authorities, frivolous lawsuits, and strategies to extend court proceedings.”
  • Although abuse with respect to custody issues after separation from an abusive partner has been widely studied, relatively little research has examined post-separation abuse beyond child custody, and these have mostly consisted of qualitative studies with relatively small sample sizes.

    “In summary, although abuse with respect to custody issues after separation from an abusive partner has been widely studied, relatively little research has examined post-separation abuse beyond child custody, and these have mostly consisted of qualitative studies with relatively small sample sizes (i.e. Crossman et al., 2016; Krigel & Benjamin, 2021; Miller & Smolter, 2011; Rivera et al., 2018; Toe”
  • Abusive former partners are more likely to seek sole physical and legal custody than non-abusive former partners, and are often awarded custody even with documented, substantiated and criminal convictions of IPV against the mother.

    “Abusive former partners are more likely to seek sole physical and legal custody than non-abusive former partners, and are often awarded custody even with documented, substantiated and criminal convictions of IPV against the mother (Bancroft et al., 2002; Meier, 2020; Miller & Smolter, 2011; Silberg & Dallam, 2019).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Miller & Smolter, 2011

  • Post-separation abuse is designed to make the former partner feel powerless, and power and control is central to understanding violence towards an intimate partner.

    “Post-separation abuse is designed to make the former partner feel powerless, and power and control is central to understanding violence towards an intimate partner (Godfrey & Robinson, 2014; Katz et al., 2020; Miller & Smolter, 2011; Stark & Hester, 2019).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Miller & Smolter, 2011

  • Abusers manipulate systems to prevent formal help-seeking behaviours, exert power, force contact, and financially burden survivors.

    “Abusers manipulate systems to prevent formal help-seeking behaviours, exert power, force contact and financially burden survivors (Miller & Smolter, 2011).”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Miller & Smolter, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, S. L., & Smolter, N. L.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Susan L.
Venue
Violence Against Women
Published
2011-04-28
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
637-650
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
OpenAlex
W2137659667
Cited by
151
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
stalking, intimate partner violence, batterers, women leaving abusive relationships, frivolous lawsuits
MeSH terms
Aggression, Criminal Law, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Power, Psychological, Spouse Abuse, United States, Stalking, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review