Cited by 50Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Children’s Everyday Lives Shadowed by Stalking: Postseparation Stalking Narratives of Finnish Children and Women

Nikupeteri, Anna, Laitinen, Merja·2015·Violence and Victims

Abstract

This qualitative study discusses post separation stalking and its implications in children's everyday lives. Based on narratives of 13 Finnish children and 20 women, the research fills a gap in the knowledge regarding the psychosocial, emotional, and physical impacts of stalking on children when their mothers are stalked by a former partner. It identifies four forms of impact: (a) an atmosphere of fear and feelings of insecurity; (b) disguised acts of stalking and the father's performance of care, love, and longing; (c) exploitation of children in stalking; and (d) physical abuse, acts of violence, and threats of death. The findings indicate that stalking severely constrains children's everyday lives and strengthens, yet often distorts, the mother-child bond. The study concludes that in cases where mothers are stalked, professionals in the social and health services, law enforcement, and criminal justice should view the children, too, as victims and construct supportive social relationships for women and children facing threatening life situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1891/0886-6708.vv-d-14-00048

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abusers may use subtle behaviours that appear to others as involved parenting, such as creating additional excuses for contact, but survivors recognize these as intrusion or harassment.

    “Abusers may use subtle behaviours that come across to others as being an ‘involved’ parent, such as creating additional excuses for contact (Nikupeteri & Laitinen, 2015), but survivors recognize these tactics as intrusion or harassment.”

    From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Nikupeteri & Laitinen, 2015

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nikupeteri, A., & Laitinen, M.
Affiliations
University of Lapland (FI)
Venue
Violence and Victims
Published
2015
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
830-845
ISSN
  • 0886-6708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7073
OpenAlex
W2276611410
Cited by
50
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence and Victims (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LaCRIS (University of Lapland) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
stalking, children's lives, mother-child bond, fear and insecurity, child exploitation, physical abuse, child victims
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Behavior, Fear, Female, Finland, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Crime Victims, Stalking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review