CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsFamily and Matrimonial Law

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Gendered Dynamics of Power in Disputes Over the Postseparation Care of Children

Elizabeth, Vivienne, Gavey, Nicola, Tolmie, Julia·2012·Violence Against Women
DOI 10.1177/1077801212452049
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A dichotomized picture of postseparation parents has emerged in family law that juxtaposes violent relationships with those that are "normal." Domestic violence scholars and advocates have played a role in reproducing this picture in their quest to secure protection for women and children. Although sympathetic, we argue this construction generates a number of problems: in particular, it obscures the gender power dynamics in relationships where women have not experienced violence. Interviews with separated mothers in dispute over contact arrangements reveal that there are significant continuities in the gender power dynamics they experience, despite differences in their exposure to male partner violence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801212452049

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Ashcraft C., 2000, Women and Language, 23, 3
  2. Boyd S. B., 2003, Child custody, law and women’s work
  3. Boyd S. B., 2004, Journal of Association for Research on Mothering, 6, 52
  4. Boyd S. B., 2006, Fathers’ rights activism and law reform in comparative perspective, 27
  5. 10.1177/0959353591013006 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/1467-6478.00201 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/3097018 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/0038038594028002005 · DOI
  9. Cooper D., 1995, Power in struggle: Feminism, sexuality and the state
  10. Davis W., 2004, Butterworth’s Family Law Journal, 4, 299
  11. Dowd N. E., 2000, Redefining fatherhood
  12. 10.1080/14680770903457105 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10691-010-9159-9 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/10778010122182730 · DOI
  15. 10.2307/1341172 · DOI
  16. Flood M., 2004, The battle and backlash rage on: Why feminism cannot be obsolete, 261
  17. 10.1177/1077801209360918 · DOI
  18. Hand T., 2009, The use of information and communication technologies to coerce and control in domestic violence and following separation
  19. 10.1177/1077801208314833 · DOI
  20. Hester M., 1996, Women, violence and male power: Feminist activism, research and practice, 81
  21. 10.1177/1077801208331246 · DOI
  22. Hunt J., 2004, Family policy briefing 3: Child contact with non-resident parents
  23. 10.1023/B:FEST.0000026077.03989.70 · DOI
  24. Kaspiew R., 2007, Sydney Law Review, 4, 131
  25. Kaye M., 2003, Australian Journal of Family Law, 17, 93
  26. Maloney L., 2007, Allegations of family violence and child abuse in Family Law children’s proceedings
  27. McInnes E., 2006, The attitudes of separated resident mothers in Australia to child-father contact
  28. Morris A., 2005, Motherhood: Power and oppression, 223
  29. 10.1177/0038038597031002002 · DOI
  30. Neustein A., 2005, From madness to mutiny: Why mothers are running from the Family Courts—and what can be done about it
  31. Reece H., 2006, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 18, 538
  32. 10.1093/lawfam/16.1.71 · DOI
  33. Smart C., 1989, Child custody and the politics of gender, 1
  34. 10.2307/1410322 · DOI
  35. Smart C., 1995, Law, crime and sexuality: Essays in feminism
  36. Smart C., 1996, Good enough mothering? Feminist perspectives on lone motherhood, 37
  37. 10.1017/S0047279497005023 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/0261018304046673 · DOI
  39. Smart C., 1999, Family fragments?
  40. 10.1007/978-1-349-27683-7_6 · DOI
  41. 10.1023/A:1009281402009 · DOI
  42. Stenhouse G., 2007, New Zealand Journal of Family Law, 5, 260
  43. Tolmie J., 2009, New Zealand Law Review, 4, 659
  44. Tolmie J., 2010, New Zealand Universities Law Review, 24, 136
  45. 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00527.x · DOI
  46. 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015545.82803.90 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1080/09649069808410261 · DOI
  48. Wallbank J., 2001, Challenging motherhood(s)
  49. 10.1007/s10691-007-9056-z · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Elizabeth, V., Gavey, N., & Tolmie, J.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
ORCID
Venue
Violence Against Women
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2012-04
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
459-481
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
DOI
10.1177/1077801212452049
OpenAlex
W2146652384
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Law › Family and Matrimonial Law
Keywords
gender and power, domestic violence, contact arrangements, family law, women's protection, intimate partner violence
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Custody, Divorce, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Parent-Child Relations, Power, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spouse Abuse, Parenting, Spouses, Dissent and Disputes, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review