The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Gendered Dynamics of Power in Disputes Over the Postseparation Care of Children
Abstract
A dichotomized picture of postseparation parents has emerged in family law that juxtaposes violent relationships with those that are "normal." Domestic violence scholars and advocates have played a role in reproducing this picture in their quest to secure protection for women and children. Although sympathetic, we argue this construction generates a number of problems: in particular, it obscures the gender power dynamics in relationships where women have not experienced violence. Interviews with separated mothers in dispute over contact arrangements reveal that there are significant continuities in the gender power dynamics they experience, despite differences in their exposure to male partner violence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Gender differences in economic power (wage disparities between partners), gendered discourses of parenting that undervalue mothers' unpaid domestic labour, and misogynistic norms that position mothers as obstructive or vindictive make mothers more vulnerable to post-separation abuse (Elizabeth et al., 2012).”
From Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Elizabeth et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Abusive Men's Use of Children to Control Their Partners and Ex-Partners
Beeble, M. L., Bybee, D., & Sullivan, C. M. (2007) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.12.1.54 · Cited by 115
Wuest, J., Ford-Gilboe, M., Merritt-Gray, M., & Lemire, S. (2006) · Health Care for Women International · doi:10.1080/07399330600770221 · Cited by 26
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- Ashcraft C., 2000, Women and Language, 23, 3
- Boyd S. B., 2003, Child custody, law and women’s work
- Boyd S. B., 2004, Journal of Association for Research on Mothering, 6, 52
- Boyd S. B., 2006, Fathers’ rights activism and law reform in comparative perspective, 27
- 10.1177/0959353591013006 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-6478.00201 · DOI
- 10.2307/3097018 · DOI
- 10.1177/0038038594028002005 · DOI
- Cooper D., 1995, Power in struggle: Feminism, sexuality and the state
- Davis W., 2004, Butterworth’s Family Law Journal, 4, 299
- Dowd N. E., 2000, Redefining fatherhood
- 10.1080/14680770903457105 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10691-010-9159-9 · DOI
- 10.1177/10778010122182730 · DOI
- 10.2307/1341172 · DOI
- Flood M., 2004, The battle and backlash rage on: Why feminism cannot be obsolete, 261
- 10.1177/1077801209360918 · DOI
- Hand T., 2009, The use of information and communication technologies to coerce and control in domestic violence and following separation
- 10.1177/1077801208314833 · DOI
- Hester M., 1996, Women, violence and male power: Feminist activism, research and practice, 81
- 10.1177/1077801208331246 · DOI
- Hunt J., 2004, Family policy briefing 3: Child contact with non-resident parents
- 10.1023/B:FEST.0000026077.03989.70 · DOI
- Kaspiew R., 2007, Sydney Law Review, 4, 131
- Kaye M., 2003, Australian Journal of Family Law, 17, 93
- Maloney L., 2007, Allegations of family violence and child abuse in Family Law children’s proceedings
- McInnes E., 2006, The attitudes of separated resident mothers in Australia to child-father contact
- Morris A., 2005, Motherhood: Power and oppression, 223
- 10.1177/0038038597031002002 · DOI
- Neustein A., 2005, From madness to mutiny: Why mothers are running from the Family Courts—and what can be done about it
- Reece H., 2006, Child and Family Law Quarterly, 18, 538
- 10.1093/lawfam/16.1.71 · DOI
- Smart C., 1989, Child custody and the politics of gender, 1
- 10.2307/1410322 · DOI
- Smart C., 1995, Law, crime and sexuality: Essays in feminism
- Smart C., 1996, Good enough mothering? Feminist perspectives on lone motherhood, 37
- 10.1017/S0047279497005023 · DOI
- 10.1177/0261018304046673 · DOI
- Smart C., 1999, Family fragments?
- 10.1007/978-1-349-27683-7_6 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1009281402009 · DOI
- Stenhouse G., 2007, New Zealand Journal of Family Law, 5, 260
- Tolmie J., 2009, New Zealand Law Review, 4, 659
- Tolmie J., 2010, New Zealand Universities Law Review, 24, 136
- 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00527.x · DOI
- 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000015545.82803.90 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/09649069808410261 · DOI
- Wallbank J., 2001, Challenging motherhood(s)
- 10.1007/s10691-007-9056-z · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Post‐separation abuse: A concept analysis
Spearman, K. J., Hardesty, J. L., & Campbell, J. (2023) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.15310 · Cited by 100
“…in economic power (wage disparities between partners), gendered discourses of parenting that undervalue mothers' unpaid domestic labour, and misogynistic norms that position mothers as obstructive or vindictive make mothers more vulnerable to post-separation abuse (Elizabeth et al., 2012).”
BackgroundCustody Stalking: A Mechanism of Coercively Controlling Mothers Following Separation
Elizabeth, V. (2017) · Feminist Legal Studies · doi:10.1007/s10691-017-9349-9 · Cited by 92
Self-citation“. . . He’s Just Swapped His Fists for the System” The Governance of Gender through Custody Law
Elizabeth, V., Gavey, N., & Tolmie, J. (2012) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243211434765 · Cited by 57
Self-citationDomestic Violence and the Paradox of Post-Separation Mothering
Holt, S. (2017) · British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw162 · Cited by 54
“Indeed, the dominant discourse across the globe contends that outcomes are more positive for children when relationships are sustained with both of their parents (Elizabeth et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialSeparated Parents Reproducing and Undoing Gender Through Defining Legitimate Uses of Child Support
Natalier, K., & Hewitt, B. A. (2014) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243214546933 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Elizabeth, V., Gavey, N., & Tolmie, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Venue
- Violence Against Women
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 459-481
- ISSN
- 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8448
- OpenAlex
- W2146652384
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Social Sciences › Law › Family and Matrimonial Law
- Keywords
- gender and power, domestic violence, contact arrangements, family law, women's protection, intimate partner violence
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Custody, Divorce, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Parent-Child Relations, Power, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spouse Abuse, Parenting, Spouses, Dissent and Disputes, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
