Cited by 73Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolencePolicing Practices and Perceptions

Rape Myth Acceptance Impacts the Reporting of Rape to the Police: A Study of Incarcerated Women

Heath, Nicole M., Lynch, Shannon M., Fritch, April M., Wong, Maria M.·2013·Violence Against Women

Abstract

We examined the association between rape myth acceptance (RMA) and reporting rapes to the police. Situational characteristics of the rape (e.g., stranger attack, injury) are known predictors of reporting, but no existing studies have examined the association between beliefs about rape and reporting. In addition, most studies of RMA do not assess victimization history. Incarcerated women experience high rates of sexual assaults prior to incarceration. We recruited 74 rape survivors from a northwestern state prison. Results suggest that women who endorsed higher levels of RMA were less likely to report their rapes to police; however, participants endorsed few rape myths.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077801213501841

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heath, N. M., Lynch, S. M., Fritch, A. M., & Wong, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Idaho State University (US)
  • Tripler Army Medical Center (US)
Venue
Violence Against Women
Published
2013-09
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
1065-1078
ISSN
  • 1077-8012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8448
OpenAlex
W2169524086
Cited by
73
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Violence Against Women (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Rush University
  • Idaho State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
rape myth acceptance, rape victims, women prisoners, sexual assault, victimization history, rape myths
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, Culture, Female, Humans, Male, Prisons, Rape, Women, Police, Survivors, Crime Victims, Law Enforcement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review