Cited by 90Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and Trauma

Barriers to Formal Help-seeking following Sexual Violence: Review from within an Ecological Systems Framework

Zinzow, Heidi M., Littleton, Heather, Muscari, Emma, Sall, Kayla·2022·Victims & Offenders

Abstract

Only a minority of adolescent/adult survivors seek formal assistance following sexual victimization, and as such may not receive adequate care. The current paper is a systematic review of the published literature on barriers to formal help-seeking from within an ecological systems framework. Results supported that survivors often face significant help-seeking barriers at multiple levels of the ecological system. At the individual level, barriers include being a member of an oppressed or minoritized group, lack of acknowledgment of the sexual victimization, and self-stigma related to one’s victimization. At the microsystem level, barriers include negative reactions to assault disclosure as well as fear of reprisal from the perpetrator. At the mesosystem and exosystem levels, barriers include a lack of resource access and availability, laws that can impede help-seeking, rigid societal gender roles, and cultural norms that emphasize secrecy and maintenance of family honor. Implications for research, practice, and policy include a need for research focused on barriers to help-seeking at multiple ecological levels, policies to increase resource availability and access, and training of providers to ensure competence to address survivors’ needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15564886.2021.1978023

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In prior research, fear of labeling effects was considered a contextual reason.

    “In prior research, fear of labeling effects was considered a contextual reason and denoted, for instance, the fear of stigmas associated with rigid gender roles (e.g., being perceived as gay, weak, or “impure”; Collin-Vézina et al., 2015; Zinzow et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zinzow, H. M., Littleton, H., Muscari, E., & Sall, K.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
Corresponding author
Zinzow, Heidi M.
Venue
Victims & Offenders
Published
2021-10-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
893-918
ISSN
  • 1556-4886 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4991
OpenAlex
W3206904038
Cited by
90
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Victims & Offenders (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
sexual violence, help-seeking barriers, ecological systems framework, self-stigma, fear of retaliation, gender roles, family honor, minoritized communities, access to resources, provider training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review