The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Boost or Bust for Democracy?: How the Web Influenced Political Attitudes and Behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 Presidential Elections
Abstract
This study employed an online survey of 442 politically interested Web users during the 2000 presidential election to examine the extent to which relying on the Web for political information influences political interest, campaign interest, political involvement, likelihood of voting, and voting behavior after controlling for demographics, political attitudes and use of the traditional media. Results from this study are compared to a similar one conducted during the 1996 presidential campaign. The respondents were highly interested in politics in general, were very interested in the 2000 campaign, expressed a high likelihood to vote, and almost all did vote. The Internet appears to engage people politically as almost two-thirds claim that their involvement in politics has increased or greatly increased since they first became online users. Politically interested Internet users were more likely to report in 2000 than 1996 that they felt they had power to bring about political change, that they were very interested in the presidential campaign, and that they were more likely to vote. The Web appears to be at least partially responsible for this increase in civic engagement as reliance on the Web was the strongest predictor of political attitudes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
Cited by
Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research
Boulianne, S. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2015.1008542 · Cited by 1,289
Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research
Boulianne, S. (2009) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584600902854363 · Cited by 924
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2004) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769900408100310 · Cited by 715
Self-citationDirect and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement
Xenos, M., & Moy, P. (2007) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00364.x · Cited by 512
Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010) · Mass Communication and Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516863 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K.
- Venue
- Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 9-34
- ISSN
- 1081-180X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170413076
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Boost or Bust for Democracy?: How the Web Influenced Political Attitudes and Behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 Presidential Elections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1081180x03008003002
- The paper
- Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2003). A Boost or Bust for Democracy?: How the Web Influenced Political Attitudes and Behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 Presidential Elections. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180x03008003002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.