The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Building the Future by Looking to the Past: Examining Research Published on Organizations and Environment
Abstract
Organizations and environment (O&E) researchers focus on either organizational outcomes or environmental outcomes. In this article, the authors argue that these are significantly different approaches to O&E research. The first aims to contribute to organization theory and performance; the latter aims to improve environmental performance. With a starting position that most research published in influential general management journals is of the organizational outcomes variety, the authors reviewed O&E research published from 1995 to 2005 to test this theory. The authors found, in fact, that most research is directed at environmental outcomes. This finding suggests that the most influential general management journals are receptive to environmental research that does not fit neatly into the organizational boxes. Yet, the authors also find that there is room for O&E research to have considerably more impact than there has been so far. This is a call for more high-quality O&E research in general management journals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Self-citationA contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy
Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925233 · Cited by 2,362
Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems
Cohen, B. (2006) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.428 · Cited by 796
Who Sustains Whose Development? Sustainable Development and the Reinvention of Nature
Banerjee, S. B. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024001341 · Cited by 785
Banerjee, S. B. (2001) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00246 · Cited by 538
Some predictors of SMJ article impact
Bergh, D. D., Perry, J., & hanke, R. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.504 · Cited by 148
Cited by
Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026615575176 · Cited by 975
Green Innovation and Financial Performance: An Institutional Approach
Aguilera-Caracuel, J., & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2013) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026613507931 · Cited by 624
Trumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1900 · Cited by 543
Rynes, S. L., Giluk, T. L., & Brown, K. G. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27151939 · Cited by 485
Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Bansal, P., & Gao, J.
- Venue
- Organization & Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 458-478
- ISSN
- 1086-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7417
- OpenAlex
- W2158753444
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 11.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building the Future by Looking to the Past: Examining Research Published on Organizations and Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1086026606294957
- The paper
- Bansal, P., & Gao, J. (2006). Building the Future by Looking to the Past: Examining Research Published on Organizations and Environment. Organization & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026606294957
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
