The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures
Abstract
This article reviews the different definitions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate sustainability (CS) used over time to reveal points of difference and congruence between the two terms. Management literature uses both CSR and CS to refer to social and environmental management issues, but there is no clear distinction between the two terms. First, the author quantifies the articles published about CSR and CS in both general management and specialized journals. Second, the author summarizes the different CSR- and CS-related definitions to identify the definitional differences between CSR and CS. Finally, the author identifies opportunities to reshape a rapidly changing field by enhancing collaboration among scholars devoted to studying CSR and CS issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brundtland, G. H. (1991) · Earth and Us · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5 · Cited by 12,174
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258888 · Cited by 7,838
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011987 · Cited by 7,567
Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct
Carroll, A. B. (1999) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/000765039903800303 · Cited by 6,316
A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm
Hart, S. L. (1995) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033 · Cited by 5,174
Corporate Social Performance Revisited
Wood, D. J. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258977 · Cited by 5,093
Campbell, J. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275684 · Cited by 4,906
Ireland, R. D., Elfring, T., & Hmieleski, K. M. (2011) · In Search of Research Excellence · doi:10.4337/9781849807630.00017 · Cited by 4,553
Cited by
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.024 · Cited by 1,540
CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices
Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2011) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.229 · Cited by 904
Similar But Not the Same: Differentiating Corporate Sustainability from Corporate Responsibility
Bansal, P., & Song, H.-C. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2015.0095 · Cited by 888
Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026616633272 · Cited by 774
Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors
Rosati, F., & Faria, L. G. D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107 · Cited by 674
Metadata
- Authors
- Montiel, I.
- Venue
- Organization & Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-269
- ISSN
- 1086-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7417
- OpenAlex
- W2117094024
- Cited by
- 770
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 59.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1086026608321329
- The paper
- Montiel, I. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures. Organization & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608321329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.