Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding the Diverse Scaling Strategies of Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Renewable Energy Cooperatives

Bauwens, Thomas, Huybrechts, Benjamin, Dufays, Frédéric·2020·Organization & Environment

Abstract

This article seeks to shed light on the diversity of scaling strategies of social enterprises, which can be considered as emblematic hybrid organizations. By comparing three Flemish renewable energy cooperatives with contrasted scaling strategies, the article shows how these strategies can be understood in relation to the organizational mission as imprinted at the founding. We extend the notion of hybridity beyond the combination of institutional logics to highlight the interest orientation (mutual vs. general interest). Unlike what is suggested in extant literature, we find that mutual interest orientation may be associated with “scale-up,” business growth strategies, while general interest orientation may lead to less growth-focused “scale-out” and “scale-deep” strategies. The findings illuminate aspects of the hybrid nature of social enterprises by explaining their diverse scaling strategies and extend the notion of imprinting to the interorganizational level by highlighting how social enterprises may collaborate to collectively achieve the pursuit of their multiple missions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1086026619837126

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00376.x · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s10551-014-2445-8 · DOI
  3. 10.5465/amj.2010.57318391 · DOI
  4. 10.5465/19416520.2014.893615 · DOI
  5. Battilana J., Lee M., Walker J., Dorsey C. (2012, Summer). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/in_search_of_the_hybrid_ideal
  6. 10.5465/amj.2013.0903 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.017 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.006 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016 · DOI
  10. Ben-Ner A., 2000, The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches, 3
  11. Besharov M. L., 2014, Organization Studies, 39, 364
  12. 10.1080/19420676.2014.954258 · DOI
  13. Campi S., 2006, Social enterprise. At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society, 29
  14. 10.1080/08985626.2014.888099 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00071-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s10551-008-9762-8 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/jsbm.12429 · DOI
  18. Defourny J., 2006, Social enterprise. At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society, 3
  19. 10.1177/1476127006066596 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/19420676.2013.871325 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/ijmr.12028 · DOI
  22. 10.1108/MD-01-2017-0089 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/0266242615585152 · DOI
  24. 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.2307/2393315 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/19420676.2013.829116 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/1094428112452151 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00021-5 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-8292.1991.tb01367.x · DOI
  30. 10.1177/1086026614545345 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00168.x · DOI
  32. 10.5840/beq201323440 · DOI
  33. 10.4324/9780203121917 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/0170840617717097 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/apce.12038 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1177/1350508416664144 · DOI
  37. 10.1086/517899 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s10551-017-3585-4 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00374.x · DOI
  40. 10.1108/17508611211226593 · DOI
  41. 10.1177/0170840615580007 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00115-5 · DOI
  43. 10.2307/3556640 · DOI
  44. 10.1287/orsc.1110.0717 · DOI
  45. 10.5465/amj.2010.57318393 · DOI
  46. 10.5465/19416520.2013.766076 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1287/orsc.1100.0633 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00375.x · DOI
  49. 10.1177/1476127016633335 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/s10551-018-4048-2 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.005 · DOI
  52. 10.1177/0007650318758329 · DOI
  53. Penrose E., 1959, The theory of the growth of the firm
  54. 10.1007/s10551-010-0584-0 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/icc/dtr026 · DOI
  56. 10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.36 · DOI
  57. 10.1177/0170840613479226 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.076 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/0149206314553276 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.12.006 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/s10551-014-2447-6 · DOI
  62. 10.1080/08985626.2010.488405 · DOI
  63. 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00386.x · DOI
  64. Stinchcombe A. L., 1965, Handbook of organizations, 142
  65. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.003 · DOI
  66. 10.1177/0001839214549042 · DOI
  67. 10.3917/mana.173.0193 · DOI
  68. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00194.x · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.09.006 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00037-1 · DOI
  71. 10.1177/0266242612457700 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Bauwens, T., Huybrechts, B., & Dufays, F.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
  • Emlyon Business School, Ecully, France
  • KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Venue
Organization & Environment
Published
2019-03-20
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
195-219
ISSN
  • 1086-0266
  • 1552-7417
Cited by
182
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review