Cited by 40Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The Assessment of Hyperactivity and Attention: Development and preliminary validation of a brief self-assessment of adult ADHD

Mehringer, Ann M., Downey, K.K., Schuh, Leslie M., Pomerleau, C.S., Snedecor, Sandy M., Schubiner, Howard·2001·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

A brief self-rating scale, the Assessment of Hyperactivity and Attention (AHA), was developed and validated using a "gold standard" DSM-based semi-structured interview. The sample consisted of 101 smokers (74% male, 73% Caucasian)-38.6% with no DSM-IV ADHD diagnosis, 10.9% with a childhood diagnosis only, and 50.5% with an adult diagnosis (requiring childhood diagnosis as well). The mean age SD was 33.7 9.7; participants smoked a mean of 19.0 5.6 cigarettes/day. Results indicate that the AHA has utility as a screening tool and as a self-report assessment of ADHD with sensitivity of .80, specificity of .60, positive predictive power of .67, negative predictive power of .75, kappa of .40, odds ratio of 6.15, and an area under the curve (receiver operating characteristic analysis) of .79. Given the high rate of ADHD among smokers, the AHA may be useful in identifying smokers who may need more in-depth clinical evaluation for attentional problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/108705470100500404

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehringer, A. M., Downey, K. K., Schuh, L. M., Pomerleau, C. S., Snedecor, S. M., & Schubiner, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Eastern Michigan University (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2001-11
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
223-231
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2041497718
Cited by
40
References
46
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01da010271-01)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 10271)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA75581, P01CA075581)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
adult ADHD, hyperactivity, attention, self-report scale, screening tool, diagnostic accuracy, smokers, attention deficits, scale validation
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Self-Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review