Cited by 49Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

Monitoring Quality of Life in Adults With ADHD: Reliability and Validity of a New Measure

Landgraf, Jeanne M.·2007·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate a questionnaire, the ADHD Impact Module for Adults (AIM-A), to dimension quality of life for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method: Six multi-item AIM scales were developed and evaluated in 317 participants enrolled in an open-label trial. Multitrait scaling analysis and correlations between the AIM-A and the ADHD Rating Scale were evaluated. Differences in scale scores based on severity (clinician rated), subtype, previous medication experience, and sensitivity to change were examined, and F statistics were compared for the AIM-A and the ADHD Rating Scale. Results: 100-80% scaling successes were observed for the AIM-A scales. Alpha coefficients were ≥.83. Significant correlations were observed (range: .494 to .200). The AIM-A discriminated based on severity, subtype, and medication experience ( p ≤ .01) and was sensitive to change ( n = 23, p ≤ .001). Conclusion: Psychometric findings are encouraging. Future efforts will examine validity and responsiveness in larger clinical samples with different therapeutic interventions. (J. of Att. Dis. 2007; 11(3) 351—362

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054707299400

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landgraf, J. M.
Affiliations
HealthActCHQ,
Corresponding author
Landgraf, Jeanne M.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2007-11
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
351-362
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2048937574
Cited by
49
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
adult ADHD, quality of life, questionnaire development, psychometric validation, ADHD Rating Scale, sensitivity to change, ADHD symptom severity, ADHD subtypes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review