Cited by 366Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Psychotherapy of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: A pilot study using a structured skills training program

Hesslinger, Bernd, Tebartz van Elst, Ludger, Nyberg, Elisabeth, Dykierek, Petra, Richter, Harald, Berner, Michael, Ebert, Dieter·2002·European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

In clinical practice many adult patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) ask for an additional psychotherapeutic intervention besides the medical therapy. In this paper we present a structured skill training program particularly tailored for adult patients with ADHD. The program is based on the principles of cognitive-behavioral treatment for borderline personality disorder developed by M. Linehan. It was modified to suit the special needs of adult patients with ADHD. In this exploratory pilot study we tested this program in a group setting. The following elements were presented: neurobiology of ADHD, mindfulness, chaos and control, behavior analysis, emotion regulation, depression, medication in ADHD, impulse control, stress management, dependency, ADHD in relationship and self respect. In an open study design patients were assessed clinically using psychometric scales (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Checklist according to DSM-IV, 16 items of the SCL-90-R, Beck-Depression Inventory, visual analogue scale) prior to and following group therapy. This treatment resulted in positive outcomes in that patients improved on all psychometric scales.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00406-002-0379-0

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hesslinger, B., Tebartz van Elst, L., Nyberg, E., Dykierek, P., Richter, H., Berner, M., & Ebert, D.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Venue
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2002-08
Volume
252
Issue
4
Pages
177-184
ISSN
  • 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
  • 0940-1334
  • 1433-8491
OpenAlex
W2025735288
Cited by
366
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
adult ADHD, psychotherapy, group therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, borderline personality disorder, mindfulness, emotion regulation, impulse control, stress management, dependency, self-esteem, ADHD medication, neurobiology of ADHD
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Task Performance and Analysis, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review