Cited by 15Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Effects of Open-Label Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate on Self-Reported Quality of Life in Adults with ADHD

Brams, Matthew, Giblin, John, Gasior, Maria, Gao, Joseph, Wigal, Timothy·2011·Postgraduate Medicine

Abstract

Objective To assess improvements in quality of life measurements during the open-label portion of a trial examining duration of efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in a simulated adult workplace environment. Methods A 4-week, open-label, dose-optimization phase followed by a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover phase to evaluate safety and efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the adult workplace environment was conducted. Clinical assessments included the ADHD Impact Module for Adults (AIM-A) to assess the effect of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate on perception of quality of life and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity/Improvement to assess symptom severity at baseline and improvement over time. Safety assessments included physical examination, treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, and electrocardiogram measurements. Results Questions 1 and 4 of the AIM-A suggest improvement from baseline in overall quality of life at week 4 with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate treatment. Post-hoc analysis revealed no significant differences attributable to either age or sex. Overall responses to questions 2 and 3, which related to overall life goals, did not change in a majority of participants during the 4-week open-label phase of this study. For all lisdexamfetamine dimesylate doses combined, treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in ≥ 5% of participants during the dose-optimization phase were decreased appetite (36.6%), dry mouth…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3810/pgm.2011.05.2288

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brod M, 2005, Prim Psychiatr., 12, 58
  2. 2010, Vyvanse [package insert]
  3. Swanson J, 1998, Psychopharmacol Bull., 34, 55
  4. Adler LA, 2009, J ADHD Relate Disord., 1, 14
  5. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brams, M., Giblin, J., Gasior, M., Gao, J., & Wigal, T.
Affiliations
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Brams, Matthew
Venue
Postgraduate Medicine
Published
2011-05
Volume
123
Issue
3
Pages
99-108
ISSN
  • 0032-5481 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-9260
OpenAlex
W2109605723
Cited by
15
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Postgraduate Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, adult ADHD, quality of life, long-acting stimulants, dose optimization, treatment-emergent adverse events, work environment
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Dextroamphetamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Workplace, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review