Cited by 6Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Is There a Link Between Motor Performance Variability and Social-Communicative Impairment in Children With ADHD-CT: A Kinematic Study Using an Upper Limb Fitts’ Aiming Task

Papadopoulos, Nicole, Rinehart, Nicole J., Bradshaw, John L., Taffe, John, McGinley, Jennifer·2015·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the relationship between motor performance and social-communicative impairment in children with ADHD-combined type (ADHD-CT). Method: An upper limb Fitts’ aiming task was used as a measure of motor performance and the Social Responsiveness Scale as a measure of social-communicative/autistic impairment in the following groups: ADHD-CT ( n = 11) and typically developing (TD) controls ( n = 10). Results: Children with ADHD-CT displayed greater variability in their movements, reflected in increased error variance over repeated aiming trials compared with TD controls. Motor performance variability was associated with social-communicative deficits in the ADHD-CT but not in the TD group. Conclusion: Social-communicative impairments further complicate the clinical picture of ADHD-CT; therefore, further research in this area is warranted to ascertain whether a particular pattern of motor disturbance in children with ADHD-CT may be clinically useful in identifying and assessing children with a more complex ADHD presentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054712454569

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with ADHD exhibit more variable movements in the spatial domain.

    “An increase in variability is also apparent in the spatial domain: individuals with ADHD exhibit more variable movements (e.g. [53]).”

    From Linking ADHD to the Neural Circuitry of Attention (2017) · cites this paper as [53]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papadopoulos, N., Rinehart, N. J., Bradshaw, J. L., Taffe, J., & McGinley, J.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2012-07-30
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
72-77
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2050425465
Cited by
6
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Monash University
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
combined type ADHD, autistic traits, upper limb motor control, error variance, children, Social Responsiveness Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Arm, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Autistic Disorder, Biomechanical Phenomena, Child, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Motion Perception, Motor Skills, Movement Disorders, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Task Performance and Analysis, Wechsler Scales, Motor Skills Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review