Cited by 171Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAction Observation and SynchronizationChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Motor Timing Deficits in Community and Clinical Boys with Hyperactive Behavior: The Effect of Methylphenidate on Motor Timing

Open access
Rubia, Katya, Noorloos, Janet, Smith, Anna, Gunning, Boudewijn, Sergeant, Joseph·2003·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

In a previous paper we showed that community children with hyperactive behavior were more inconsistent than controls in the temporal organization of their motor output. In this study we investigated: (1) various aspects of motor timing processes in 13 clinically diagnosed boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who were compared to 11 community boys with hyperactive behavior and to a control group and (2) the effect of methylphenidate on the motor timing processes in the clinical group with ADHD in a double blind, cross-over, medication-placebo design, including 4 weeks of medication. The clinical group with ADHD, like the community group with hyperactivity, showed greater variability in sensorimotor synchronization and in sensorimotor anticipation relative to controls. The clinical group was also impaired in time perception, which was spared in the community group with hyperactivity. The persistent, but not the acute dose, of methylphenidate reduced the variability of sensorimotor synchronization and anticipation, but had no effect on time perception. This study shows that motor timing functions are impaired in both clinical and community children with hyperactivity. It is the first study to show the effectiveness of persistent administration of methylphenidate on deficits in motor timing in ADHD children and extends the use of methylphenidate from the domain of attentional and inhibitory functions to the domain of executive motor timing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023233630774

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study's findings could extend evidence for acute and chronic methylphenidate administration significantly improving timing and attention functions in children with ADHD including the same tasks.

    “These findings could extend evidence for acute and chronic methylphenidate administration significantly improving timing (66, 94) and attention functions in children with ADHD including the same tasks (22, 29–31).”

    From Differential effects of a single dose of Lisdexamfetamine and Guanfacine on cognitive function in children with ADHD (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Medication Effect section reports improved motor-timing variability after persistent methylphenidate use, but says a single dose was no more effective than placebo. The Conclusions likewise limit the improvement to persistent administration. This source therefore supports the chronic-timing part, not the claim that acute administration significantly improved timing. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RTV has been associated with poorer academic performance, motor development, and motor timing in children with ADHD.

    “RTV likewise has been associated with poorer academic performance (64), motor development (65), and motor timing (21, 66) in children with ADHD.”
  • The findings are in line with consistent evidence for higher response variability and slower reaction times in ADHD, thought to reflect poor concentration, attention lapses and poor stimulus anticipation.

    “The findings are in line with consistent evidence for higher response variability and slower reaction times in ADHD, thought to reflect poor concentration, attention lapses and poor stimulus anticipation.6, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Le Moal, A. (1995). Mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic neurons: Func- tional and regulatory roles. In F. Bloom & D. J. Kupfer (Eds.), Psychopharmacology: The fourth generation of progress (pp. 283- 294). New York: Raven Press. An Official Publication of the Amer- ican College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
  2. Milich, R., Hartung, C. M., Martin, C. A., & Haigler, E. D. (1995). Dis- inhibition and underlying processes in hyperactive and aggressive adolescents. In D. K. Routh (Ed.), Disruptive behavior disorder in childhood: Essays honoring Herbert C. Quay (pp. 109-139). New York: Plenum.
  3. Smith, A. (2002). Time estimation and discrimination in children with hyperactivity. Doctoral dissertation, University of London, London.
  4. Sonneville, L. M. J., Njiokiktjien, C., & Hilhorst, R. C. (1991). Methylphenidate-induced changes in ADHD information process- ing. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 285-295.
  5. Tannock, R., Schachar, R., Carr, R. P., Chajczyk, R. P., & Logan, G. D. (1989). Effect of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperac- tive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 473-491.
  6. Zackay, D. (1990). The evasive art of subjective time measurement. In R. A. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 59- 84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rubia, K., Noorloos, J., Smith, A., Gunning, B., & Sergeant, J.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Rubia, Katya
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2003-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
301-313
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2159542284
Cited by
170
References
84
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
motor timing, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, hyperactivity, methylphenidate, sensorimotor synchronization, time perception, temporal variation, executive function, children
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Discrimination, Psychological, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Motor Skills, Residence Characteristics, Time Perception, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review