CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 140Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyBehavioral and Psychological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Dialectical Behavior Therapy Group Skills Training for ADHD Among College Students

Fleming, Andrew P., McMahon, Robert J., Moran, Lyndsey R., Peterson, A. Paige, Dreessen, Anthony·2015·Journal of Attention Disorders
DOI 10.1177/1087054714535951
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: ADHD affects between 2% and 8% of college students and is associated with broad functional impairment. No prior randomized controlled trials with this population have been published. The present study is a pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) group skills training adapted for college students with ADHD. Method: Thirty-three undergraduates with ADHD between ages 18 and 24 were randomized to receive either DBT group skills training or skills handouts during an 8-week intervention phase. ADHD symptoms, executive functioning (EF), and related outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up. Results: Participants receiving DBT group skills training showed greater treatment response rates (59-65% vs. 19-25%) and clinical recovery rates (53-59% vs. 6-13%) on ADHD symptoms and EF, and greater improvements in quality of life. Conclusion: DBT group skills training may be efficacious, acceptable, and feasible for treating ADHD among college students. A larger randomized trial is needed for further evaluation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054714535951

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 45 references

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Beck A. T., 1996, BDI-II manual
  2. Brown T. E., 1996, Attention-Deficit Disorder Scales manual
  3. 10.1037/0894-4105.15.2.211 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Richards T. L., 1999, Journal of College Student Development, 40, 299
  5. SPSS Inc, 2010, SPSS base 19.0 for Windows user’s guide
  6. Tuckman A., 2007, Integrative treatment for adult ADHD
  7. Zwart L. M., 2001, Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 15, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–140 of 140

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fleming, A. P., McMahon, R. J., Moran, L. R., Peterson, A. P., & Dreessen, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2014-05-29
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
260-271
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
DOI
10.1177/1087054714535951
OpenAlex
W2083911626
Cited by
140
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dialectical behavior therapy, group skills training, university students, executive function, quality of life, treatment efficacy, treatment acceptability, feasibility
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Social Adjustment, Students, Young Adult, Executive Function, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review