Cited by 64Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Feasibility, Acceptability and Preliminary Efficacy of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Autistic Adults without Intellectual Disability: A Mixed Methods Study

Open access
Bemmouna, Doha, Coutelle, Romain, Weibel, Sébastien, Weiner, Luisa·2022·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Self-harm and suicidal behaviors are prevalent among autistic adults without intellectual disability (ID). Emotion dysregulation (ED), the difficulty in modulating emotions, has been identified as an important risk factor. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) has been proved effective to treat ED in disorders other than autism spectrum disorder. Our study aimed at assessing the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of DBT in seven autistic adults without ID exhibiting self-harm and/or suicidal behaviors linked to severe ED. Our results suggest that DBT is feasible and highly acceptable to autistic adults without ID. Additionally, mean scores on the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale decreased significantly post-treatment and at 4-month follow-up, suggesting that DBT might be efficacious in reducing ED in this population. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-021-05317-w

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

52 of 118 cited sources checked · 27 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Emotion dysregulation (ED) has been identified as an important risk factor for self-harm and suicidal behaviors in autistic individuals.

    “Emotion dysregulation (ED), the difficulty in modulating emotions, has been identified as an important risk factor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Mazefsky et al., 2013 source

      In the passage labeled Abstract > Conclusions (page unavailable), the paper says autistic individuals may respond to emotional stimuli with self-injury because of inadequate emotion regulation. It does not identify emotion dysregulation as an established risk factor for suicidal behavior, and its account of the self-injury link is tentative. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Moseley et al., 2019 source

      In the Discussion section, alexithymia—which the authors say encompasses emotion dysregulation—significantly predicted self-injury in autistic people without intellectual disability. The paper distinguishes alexithymia from emotion dysregulation and does not establish emotion dysregulation itself as an independent risk factor. It notes a relationship between self-injury and later suicidality, but does not show that emotion dysregulation predicts suicidal behavior. Page numbers were not provided in the passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Conner et al., 2020 source

      The Discussion reports that emotion-regulation impairment was significantly associated with parent-reported suicidal ideation and behavior in the ASD groups. The Methods measure of behavior includes deliberate self-harm or attempted suicide. However, the paper describes an association, not an established risk factor, and does not assess self-harm separately from suicide attempts. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) has been proved effective to treat ED in disorders other than autism spectrum disorder.

    “Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) has been proved effective to treat ED in disorders other than autism spectrum disorder.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Linehan et al., 2006 source

      The Abstract (page not provided) reports that DBT improved outcomes for women with borderline personality disorder, a disorder other than autism spectrum disorder. But the trial measured suicidal behavior, service use, and general psychological functioning; it does not establish effectiveness for ED specifically. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Panos et al., 2014 source

      The Introduction and Discussion report that DBT targets emotional regulation and is effective for some outcomes in adults with borderline personality disorder, a disorder other than autism spectrum disorder. But the Introduction says the review dropped its behavioral-skills outcome because it was not consistently measured, and the Discussion says there is insufficient evidence that DBT successfully teaches those skills. It therefore does not establish that DBT is effective specifically for emotional dysregulation (ED). (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Safer et al., 2001 source
  • Premisecitation

    Alexithymia has been identified as predictive of using self-harm to regulate emotions, especially those related to high-energy affective states.

    “Alexithymia, in particular, a prevalent trait in ASD (Kinnaird et al., 2019; Ziermans et al., 2019), has been identified as predictive of using self-harm to regulate emotions, especially those related to high-energy affective states (Moseley et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kinnaird et al., 2019 source
    • cites Ziermans et al., 2019 source
    • cites Moseley et al., 2019 source
  • Premisecitation

    There is a growing body of literature suggesting that ED might be a relevant treatment target in autistic individuals, especially those with self-harming behaviors and increased suicidality.

    “There is a growing body of literature suggesting that ED might be a relevant treatment target in autistic individuals (Reyes et al., 2019; Conner et al., 2020), especially those with self-harming behaviors and increased suicidality (Moseley et al., 2019; Conner et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Reyes et al., 2019 source
    • cites Conner et al., 2020 source
    • cites Moseley et al., 2019 source

      In the Discussion section, alexithymia predicts self-injury in autistic people without intellectual disability, and participants describe emotional-awareness and regulation strategies as helpful. The paper says alexithymia is not equivalent to emotional dysregulation and notes a relationship between self-injury and later suicidality; it does not establish emotional dysregulation as a treatment target specifically for autistic people with increased suicidality. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationcitation

    These improvements are in line with previous studies that support effectiveness of DBT in reducing suicidal behaviors.

    “These improvements are in line with previous studies that support the effectiveness of DBT in reducing suicidal behaviors (Panos et al., 2014; DeCou et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Panos et al., 2014 source
    • cites DeCou et al., 2019 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 59
  • May combine two claims. 78
  • Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis including 37 studies revealed a prevalence of self-harm of 42% in autistic individuals, irrespective of age and the presence or absence of intellectual disability (ID).

    “A meta-analysis including 37 studies revealed a prevalence of self-harm of 42% in autistic individuals, irrespective of age and the presence or the absence of intellectual disability (ID) (Steenfeldt-Kristensen et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steenfeldt-Kristensen et al., 2020 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Self-harm and suicidal behaviors are prevalent among autistic adults without intellectual disability (ID).

    “Self-harm and suicidal behaviors are prevalent among autistic adults without intellectual disability (ID).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hollocks et al., 2019 source

      The Abstract and the ‘Presence of ID’ section report anxiety and depression prevalence, including estimates for adults without ID, but do not report self-harm or suicidal-behavior prevalence. Searches for ‘self-harm’ and ‘suicide’ found only a reference to a study of suicidal ideation, not a finding that establishes the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Licence et al., 2019 source

      The Results report self-harm in 24.1% of a sample without identified adaptive-functioning impairments, but the Participants section says only 19 of the 83 participants were adults; that figure is not an adult-specific prevalence estimate. The paper describes heightened suicidality in autistic samples in its introductory discussion, but does not establish the prevalence of suicidal behaviors specifically among autistic adults without ID. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Cassidy et al., 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a sample of recently diagnosed autistic adults without ID, 66% self-reported suicidal ideation and 35% self-reported plans or attempts of suicide.

    “Indeed, in a sample of recently diagnosed autistic adults without ID, 66% self-reported suicidal ideation and 35% self-reported plans or attempts of suicide (Cassidy et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cassidy et al., 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Autistic adults are at greater risk of co-occurring psychiatric disorders, self-harm and suicidal behaviors compared to the general population.

    “Autistic adults are at greater risk of co-occurring psychiatric disorders, self-harm and suicidal behaviors compared to the general population (Hollocks et al., 2019; Licence et al., 2019; Cassidy et al., 2020; Moseley et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hollocks et al., 2019 source

      The Summary of main findings (page not specified) reports higher rates of co-occurring anxiety and depression in autistic adults than estimates for the general population. The paper does not report a corresponding comparison for self-harm or suicidal behaviors; suicidal ideation appears only in a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Licence et al., 2019 source

      The introduction reports greater psychiatric-disorder risk in autistic people than in neurotypical people and describes heightened suicidality in autistic samples. The Discussion compares a 24.1% self-harm rate in its child-and-adult sample with 5–17% in neurotypical samples, and cites a high rate in autistic adults. The copy does not establish a specifically adult, general-population comparison for suicidal behaviors, so that part of the sentence is more specific than the evidence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Cassidy et al., 2020 source

      The paper’s opening section states that autistic adults are significantly more likely than the general population to experience non-suicidal self-injury, and that autistic people are more likely to die by self-harm or suicide. In “Prevalence and Risk Markers,” it says co-occurring psychiatric conditions increase suicidality risk among autistic adults, but does not say those conditions are more common in autistic adults than in the general population. The psychiatric-disorders comparison is therefore unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Licence et al. (2019) reported a prevalence of self-harm of 24% in their autistic sample.

    “Consistent with these findings, more recently, Licence et al. (2019) reported a prevalence of self-harm of 24% in their autistic sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Licence et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Suicidal ideation and suicidal attempts have been reported at high rates in autistic individuals, with the prevalence of suicidal attempts ranging between 7 and 47%.

    “In addition to self-harm, suicidal ideation and suicidal attempts have also been reported at high rates in autistic individuals (Hedley & Uljarević, 2018; Dell'Osso et al., 2019), with the prevalence of suicidal attempts ranging between 7 and 47% (Zahid & Upthegrove, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hedley & Uljarević, 2018 source
    • cites Dell'Osso et al., 2019 source
    • cites Zahid & Upthegrove, 2017 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In ASD, ED has been identified as a risk factor in the emergence of self-harm, as autistic individuals may use self-harming behaviors as a way to regulate painful emotions.

    “In ASD, ED has also been identified as a risk factor in the emergence of self-harm, as autistic individuals may use self-harming behaviors as a way to regulate painful emotions, i.e., low-energy affective states such as depression or high-energy affective states such as anger and anxiety (Moseley et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Moseley et al., 2019 source

      In the Discussion’s ‘Predictors of self-injury’ section, the authors report that alexithymia predicted self-injury in autistic people without intellectual disability, and that participants used self-injury to regulate low-energy states such as depression and high-energy states including anxiety and anger. They explicitly distinguish alexithymia from emotional dysregulation, however, and do not establish emotional dysregulation itself as a risk factor for the emergence of self-harm. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Several studies on clinical and non-clinical samples revealed a significant positive association between ED and self-harm, as well as a significant positive association between ED and suicidal ideation and attempts.

    “Several studies on clinical and non-clinical samples revealed a significant positive association between ED and self-harm (Wolff, 2019), as well as a significant positive association between ED and suicidal ideation and attempts (Turton et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wolff, 2019 source
    • cites Turton et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Briefer DBT formats have the advantage of being more feasible, cost-effective, and easily implementable in clinical settings.

    “Moreover, briefer formats have the advantage of being more feasible, cost-effective, and easily implementable in clinical settings (McMain et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McMain et al., 2018 source

      The Background describes the potential cost-effectiveness and ease of delivery of six-month DBT, and the Discussion says it could be a less resource-intensive alternative if outcomes are comparable. But the Background also says its health-economic impact has not been evaluated, so the paper does not establish cost-effectiveness or easier implementation as demonstrated advantages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In autistic individuals, DBT has been recommended to treat ED but its feasibility and preliminary efficacy have not been investigated.

    “In autistic individuals, DBT has been recommended to treat ED but its feasibility and preliminary efficacy have not been investigated (Hartmann et al., 2012; Mazefsky and White, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hartmann et al., 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Mazefsky and White, 2014 source

      In Current Approaches to Practice, the paper says DBT has been considered for adaptation to clients with ASD and that there have been no clinical trials or published treatment-outcome research. This supports the lack of published efficacy evidence, but it does not specifically establish that feasibility has not been investigated. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In a sample of autistic children and adolescents, greater ED was associated with an increased likelihood of suicidal ideation and attempts.

    “Indeed, in a sample of autistic children and adolescents, Conner et al. (2020) reported that greater ED was associated with an increased likelihood of suicidal ideation and attempts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Conner et al., 2020 source

      The Results report that higher emotion-regulation impairment was associated with parent-reported suicidal ideation and with a combined measure of suicidal behaviors or attempts in the ASD groups. The Discussion > Limitations states that the study did not assess suicide attempts separately, so it cannot establish the claimed association with attempts specifically. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Two population-based cohort studies led in Denmark and Sweden reported respectively a 3.7 and a 9-fold increase in death by suicide among autistic adults without ID compared to the general population.

    “More generally, two population-based cohort studies led in Denmark and Sweden highlighted the importance of this problem in autistic individuals, as they reported respectively a 3.7 and a 9-fold increase in death by suicide among autistic adults without ID compared to the general population (Hirvikoski et al., 2016; Kõlves et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hirvikoski et al., 2016 source

      Table 4 (Clinical implications; page unavailable) reports a suicide-mortality odds ratio of 9.40 (95% CI 7.43–11.90) for the Swedish high-functioning ASD group versus controls, supporting the approximately ninefold figure for autistic people without intellectual disability. The estimate is not restricted to adults, so the paper does not establish that figure specifically for autistic adults. The Danish 3.7-fold figure is attributed to the other cited study, not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Kõlves et al., 2021 source

      The Danish study’s Results > Suicide report a 3.75-fold higher suicide rate for people with ASD overall, but a 4.73-fold rate for those with ASD without intellectual disability—not the claimed 9-fold rate for that subgroup. The study supports an elevated suicide rate, but not the sentence’s subgroup-specific magnitude; its Swedish-study figure cannot be assessed from this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants had previous diagnoses of ASD supported by the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition revised module 4 (ADOS-2), as well as previous IQ assessments based on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) indicating the absence of ID (Total IQ above 80).

    “They had previous diagnoses of ASD supported by the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R; Rutter et al., 2003) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition revised module 4 (ADOS-2; Hus & Lord, 2014; Lord et al., 2012), as well as previous IQ assessments based on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV; Wechsler, 2011) indicating the absence of ID (T”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Rutter et al., 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hus & Lord, 2014 source
    • cites Wechsler, 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In clinical populations, the BHS proved to discriminate between individuals with a high and moderate risk of suicide, as well as individuals with and without a history of suicide attempts.

    “In clinical populations, the BHS proved to discriminate between individuals with a high and moderate risk of suicide, as well as individuals with and without a history of suicide attempts (Granö et al., 2017; Balsamo et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Granö et al., 2017 source
    • cites Balsamo et al., 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In autistic individuals, the WHOQoL-BREF has good psychometric properties.

    “In autistic individuals, the WHOQoL-BREF has good psychometric properties (McConachie et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McConachie et al., 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Missing data were handled by considering the overall mean of the scale or subscale.

    “In case of missing data, we considered the overall mean of the scale or the subscale (Kaushal, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kaushal, 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Their reports are in line with findings showing that COVID-19 pandemic increased distress and depression in autistic individuals and decreased their quality of life.

    “Their reports are in line with findings showing that the COVID-19 pandemic increased the level of distress and depression in autistic individuals and decreased their quality of life (Mutluer et al., 2020; Patel et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mutluer et al., 2020 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports increased distress, stress, and low mood in families with ASD during the pandemic, and worsening behavioral problems in individuals with ASD. It does not establish increased depression in autistic individuals or a decrease in their quality of life; its discussion of increased depression concerns typically developing children, not the ASD sample. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Patel et al., 2021 source

      The main text (page unavailable) says COVID-19 likely increased distress among autistic people and may have worsened their mental health, including risk of depression. It also acknowledges a lack of published research, so it does not present these as established findings. It does not report a decrease in autistic people's quality of life; its reference to quality concerns the care delivered by caregivers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent research has highlighted high prevalence of self-harm and suicidal behaviors in this population and lack of psychological interventions aiming to address them.

    “The latter point is particularly important given that recent research has highlighted the high prevalence of self-harm and suicidal behaviors in this population and the lack of psychological interventions aiming to address them (Licence et al., 2019; Cassidy et al., 2020; Moseley et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Licence et al., 2019 source

      The Discussion (page not supplied) reports a 24.1% prevalence of self-harm in the autistic sample, and the paper notes heightened suicidality in autistic people. It also describes difficulty accessing mental-health support and a shortage of trained professionals, but does not establish a lack of psychological interventions specifically aimed at self-harm or suicidal behavior. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Cassidy et al., 2020 source
    • cites Moseley et al., 2020 source

      The paper states that autistic people appear to have higher rates of suicide and self-injury (section labeled Abstract > Conclusions; page unavailable). It calls for support and intervention, but our copy does not establish a lack of psychological interventions targeting self-harm and suicidal behavior. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Participants judged the adaptations introduced to DBT as relevant, consistent with findings suggesting adaptations are required to foster feasibility of psychotherapies in autistic individuals.

    “They also judged the adaptations introduced to DBT as relevant, consistent with findings suggesting that adaptations are required to foster the feasibility of psychotherapies in autistic individuals (Weston et al., 2016; Cooper et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Weston et al., 2016 source

      The Discussion (p. 12) says CBT should be adapted to meet the needs of people with ASDs, supporting the general rationale for adaptations. It also says whether those adaptations improve treatment engagement remains largely untested; it does not establish that adaptations are required for the feasibility of psychotherapies generally. The participants’ judgment of DBT adaptations is a finding of the citing study, not one attributed to Weston et al. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Cooper et al., 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In other clinical samples than autistic adults, previous findings suggest that DBT may have a significant positive effect on some (i.e., "Strategies" and "Goals") or all of the DERS subscales.

    “In other clinical samples than autistic adults, previous findings suggest that DBT may have a significant positive effect on some (i.e., “Strategies” and “Goals”) or all of the DERS subscales (e.g. Gibson et al., 2014; Neacsiu et al., 2014; Alavi et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gibson et al., 2014 source
    • cites Neacsiu et al., 2014 source
    • cites Alavi et al., 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Overall, the significant improvement in self-reported ED is consistent with our clinical observations and with findings relative to DBT in several disorders.

    “Overall, the significant improvement in self-reported ED is consistent with our clinical observations and with findings relative to DBT in several disorders (Panos et al., 2014; DeCou et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Panos et al., 2014 source

      The Results and Discussion report that DBT reduced suicidal and self-harming behavior in patients with borderline personality disorder. The Introduction identifies emotional regulation as a DBT target, but the paper does not establish improvement in self-reported emotional dysregulation; the Discussion says evidence is insufficient to conclude that DBT teaches skills needed for long-term improvement. This paper therefore supports a DBT finding in one disorder, not the broader implication that it found improvement in emotional dysregulation across several disorders (page numbers unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites DeCou et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This is consistent with several findings suggesting that emotion regulation skills use is a key change mechanism of DBT.

    “This is consistent with several findings suggesting that emotion regulation skills use is a key change mechanism of DBT (Lynch et al., 2006; Neacsiu et al., 2010; Mehlum, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lynch et al., 2006 source
    • cites Neacsiu et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Mehlum, 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    This heterogeneity might be considered as representative of variability present among autistic population.

    “However, this heterogeneity might be considered as representative of the variability present among the autistic population (Masi et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Masi et al., 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Our study was disrupted by COVID-19 pandemic, which was the case for clinical research in general.

    “Finally, our study was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which was the case for clinical research in general (Padala et al., 2020; Sathian et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Padala et al., 2020 source
    • cites Sathian et al., 2020 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Alexithymia cannot be reduced to "Awareness", i.e., being aware of one's emotions; it also encompasses difficulties in describing feelings, externally orientated thinking and constricted imaginal processes.

    “However, we note that alexithymia cannot be reduced to “Awareness”, i.e., being aware of one's emotions. Indeed, it also encompasses difficulties in describing one’s feelings, externally orientated thinking and constricted imaginal processes (Goerlich, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goerlich, 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    All measures were self-reported, which can be problematic since autistic individuals might present with high levels of alexithymia, which can interfere with ability to recognize emotional states.

    “Fifth, all the measures were self-reported. This can be particularly problematic since autistic individuals might present with high levels of alexithymia, which can interfere with their ability to recognize their emotional states (Kinnaird et al., 2019; Ziermans et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kinnaird et al., 2019 source
    • cites Ziermans et al., 2019 source
  • Borderline on S1 (asserted), S4 (based): unclear from the text.

    Findingnone given

    All participants reported that DBT had a beneficial effect on their self-harm and/or suicidal behaviors, including suicidal ideation.

    “All participants reported that DBT had a beneficial effect on their self-harm and/or suicidal behaviors, including suicidal ideation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The DBT diary card self-reports of self-harm and suicidal behaviors are accurate.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    DBT is feasible and highly acceptable to autistic adults without ID.

    “Our results suggest that DBT is feasible and highly acceptable to autistic adults without ID.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The COVID-19-related interruption of group sessions did not substantially affect the feasibility, acceptability, or preliminary efficacy of DBT.
    • Rests on an assumption: The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire for psychotherapeutic services (CSQ-8) is a valid measure of satisfaction with psychotherapy in autistic adults without ID.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The internal consistency of the BDI-II for baseline scores in the current sample was excellent (α = 0.96).

    “The internal consistency of the BDI-II for baseline scores in the current sample was excellent (α = 0.96).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The internal consistency of the GAFS-8 for baseline scores in the current sample was excellent (α = 0.93).

    “The internal consistency of the GAFS-8 for baseline scores in the current sample was excellent (α = 0.93).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The internal consistency of the BHS for baseline scores in the current sample was good (α = 0.82).

    “The internal consistency of the BHS for baseline scores in the current sample was good (α = 0.82).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among ten participants initially approached, seven (three women and four men) were included and received at least half of the therapy, two were excluded and one declined to participate.

    “Among the ten participants initially approached, seven (three women and four men) were included and received at least half of the therapy, two were excluded and one declined to participate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Total IQ scores ranged from 81 to 156 (M = 108.8; SD = 25.69).

    “Total IQ scores ranged from 81 to 156 (M = 108.8; SD = 25.69) (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The seven participants were aged between 19 and 56 years (M = 27.71; SD = 13.34).

    “The seven participants were aged between 19 and 56 years (M = 27.71; SD = 13.34).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Two participants were excluded respectively due to frequent hospitalizations related to a comorbid bipolar disorder and failing to complete post-treatment measures.

    “Two participants were excluded respectively due to frequent hospitalizations related to a comorbid bipolar disorder and failing to complete post-treatment measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On "Clarity" subscale, 4 (57%) of seven reported reliable improvement post-treatment and 3 (50%) of 6 at follow-up.

    “On the “Clarity” subscale, reliable improvement was reported by 4 (57%) participants out of seven post-treatment and by 3 (50%) out of 6 at follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The test–retest reliability of the French version of the DERS is sufficiently applicable to the modified DERS total and subscale scores in autistic adults for the RCI calculation to be informative.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For the five participants who completed therapy, attendance rate was 96%; for the two who participated only in first half, rate was 100% before dropout.

    “Specifically, for the five participants who completed the therapy, the rate was 96% and for the two participants who only participated in the first half of the therapy, the rate was 100% before dropout.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The seven participants completed all assessments and missing data were rare (less than 5%).

    “The seven participants completed all assessments and missing data were rare (less than 5%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Five main themes emerged from thematic analysis of transcripts.

    “Five main themes emerged from the thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) of the transcripts (Table 4):”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Braun & Clarke, 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One dropout was due to concerns related to COVID-19 risk when group sessions resumed in June 2020 after 2 months of lockdown; the other was due to professional reasons.

    “One dropout was due to concerns related to the risk of contracting COVID-19 when the group sessions were resumed in June 2020 after 2 months of lockdown and the other was due to professional reasons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The decrease in mean GAFS-8 score was neither significant post-treatment (p = 0.293, r = − 0.52) nor at follow-up (p = 0.293, r = − 0.52).

    “Regarding alexithymia, the decrease in the mean GAFS-8 score was neither significant post-treatment (p = 0.293, r = − 0.52) nor at follow-up (p = 0.293, r = − 0.52).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Self-reported level of depression returned to baseline for 1 participant after improving post-treatment and worsened for another at follow-up.

    “The self-reported level of depression returned to baseline for 1 participant after improving post-treatment and worsened for another one at follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants reported high satisfaction with therapy; CSQ-8 mean score was 3.59 out of 4 (Range = 3.13-4; SD = 0.31).

    “Participants, including the two who completed only half the therapy, reported high satisfaction with the therapy as the CSQ-8 mean score was 3.59 out of 4 (Range = 3.13–4; SD = 0.31) (Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean DERS "Awareness" subscale decreased significantly post-treatment (p = 0.036, r = − 1.00) and maintained at follow-up (p = 0.031, r = − 1.00).

    ““Awareness” (post-treatment: p = 0.036, r = − 1.00; follow-up: p = 0.031, r = − 1.00)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Some participants suggested interactions between participants during group sessions could be further encouraged by facilitators.

    “Some participants suggested that interactions between participants during group sessions could be further encouraged by the facilitators.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Theme (a): The environment of the group, described as "caring" and "reassuring", allowed participants to "feel confident"; some mentioned activity to normalize anxiety in first session helped them feel more relaxed.

    “(a) The environment of the group, described as “caring” and “reassuring”, allowed them to “feel confident”. Some mentioned that the activity to normalize anxiety in the first session helped them to feel more relaxed;”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean DERS "Impulse" subscale decreased significantly post-treatment (p = 0.036, r = − 1.00) and maintained at follow-up (p = 0.034, r = − 1.00).

    ““Impulse” (post-treatment: p = 0.036, r = − 1.00; follow-up: p = 0.034, r = − 1.00)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean DERS "Strategies" subscale decreased significantly post-treatment (p = 0.035, r = − 1.00) and maintained at follow-up (p = 0.036, r = − 1.00).

    ““Strategies” (post-treatment: p = 0.035, r = − 1.00; follow-up: p = 0.036, r = − 1.00)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mean BDI-II scores decreased significantly post-treatment (p = 0.031, r = − 0.93), showing decrease in self-reported depression.

    “Mean scores on the BDI-II and BHS also decreased significantly post-treatment (respectively, p = 0.031 and r = − 0.93; p = 0.022 and r = − 1.00) showing a decrease in self-reported levels of depression and hopelessness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Some participants suggested adding short and regular skills reviews during group sessions.

    “Some participants suggested adding short and regular skills reviews during the group sessions;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One participant reported a decrease in intensity of suicidal ideation and a higher "tolerance threshold" towards situations that usually triggered suicidal thoughts post-treatment and at follow-up.

    “One participant also reported a decrease in the intensity of suicidal ideation and a higher “tolerance threshold” towards situations that usually triggered suicidal thoughts post-treatment and at follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The DBT diary card self-reports of self-harm and suicidal behaviors are accurate.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Their intention to return to care unit if needed scored 3.43 and likelihood to recommend therapy to a friend scored 3.57 out of 4.

    “Their intention to return to the care unit if needed and their likelihood to recommend the therapy to a friend also scored high, respectively 3.43 and 3.57 out of 4.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Three participants had initial BDI-II autism-specific T-score in severe range and were in moderate range post-treatment; one participant changed from "possibly depressed" to "unlikely depressed" post-treatment.

    “Three participants had initial BDI-II autism-specific T−score on the severe range (1 almost certainly depressed and 2 very likely depressed), and they were on the moderate range post-treatment (Likely and possibly depressed); one participant’s BDI-II autism-specific T−score changed from “possibly depressed” to “unlikely depressed” post-treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    2 (30%) participants showed reliable worsening at follow-up on "Clarity" subscale, one after reliably improving post-treatment.

    “2 (30%) participants showed a reliable worsening at follow-up on this scale, one of them after reliably improving post-treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The test–retest reliability of the French version of the DERS is sufficiently applicable to the modified DERS total and subscale scores in autistic adults for the RCI calculation to be informative.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At follow-up, 2 (50%) participants reported no self-harming behaviors during 4 months following end of therapy; other 2 (50%) reported few self-harming behaviors (2 to 4) during 4-month follow-up.

    “At follow-up, 2 (50%) participants reported that they had not engaged in self-harming behaviors during the 4 months following the end of the therapy; and the other 2 (50%) reported having had few self-harming behaviors (ranging from 2 to 4) during the 4-month follow-up period.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The DBT diary card self-reports of self-harm and suicidal behaviors are accurate.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The participant without a follow-up measure joined the group mid-therapy and completed therapy with a time lag.

    “The participant without a follow-up measure is the one who joined the group mid-therapy and completed the therapy with a time lag.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Theme (d): Individual weekly therapy sessions were considered essential as they allowed participants to "dissect specific real-life situations", "put skills together", and "step back from emotional episodes".

    “(d) the individual weekly therapy sessions were considered essential as they allowed participants to “dissect specific real-life situations”, “put skills together”, and “step back from emotional episodes”;”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Theme (b): The group setting of skills training was considered rewarding due to diversity of profiles; led them to "feel less alone with personal difficulties" and to "meet people like me".

    “(b) the group setting of the skills training was considered rewarding due to the diversity of profiles; this led them to “feel less alone with personal difficulties” and to “meet people like me”.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Theme (e): DBT helped participants start building a life worth living as they felt they could "accept themselves and their ASD more", "survive crisis episodes", "allow themselves to have more fun activities", "identify one's values" and take steps in valued directions.

    “(e) DBT helped participants to start building a life worth living as they felt that they could “accept themselves and their ASD more”, “survive crisis episodes”, “allow themselves to have more fun activities”, “identify one's values” and to take steps in valued directions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On "Impulse" subscale, 3 (43%) of 7 reported reliable improvement post-treatment and 5 (83%) of 6 at follow-up.

    “Reliable improvement was reported on the “Impulse” subscale by 3 (43%) participants out of 7 post-treatment and by 5 (83%) out of 6 at follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The test–retest reliability of the French version of the DERS is sufficiently applicable to the modified DERS total and subscale scores in autistic adults for the RCI calculation to be informative.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On "Awareness" subscale, 1 (14%) of 7 showed reliable improvement post-treatment and 2 (33%) of 6 at follow-up.

    “On the “Awareness” subscale, one (14%) participant out of 7 showed reliable improvement post-treatment and 2 (33%) out of 6 at follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The test–retest reliability of the French version of the DERS is sufficiently applicable to the modified DERS total and subscale scores in autistic adults for the RCI calculation to be informative.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    One participant reported having "a new and healthier life", which led her to grieve the life before therapy where suicide attempts and hospitalizations were frequent.

    “One participant reported having “a new and healthier life”, which led her to grieve the life before therapy where suicide attempts and hospitalizations were frequent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On "Strategies" subscale, 5 (71%) of seven demonstrated reliable improvement post-treatment and 3 (50%) of 6 at follow-up.

    “On the subscale level, 5 (71%) participants out of seven demonstrated reliable improvement at the “Strategies” subscale post-treatment and 3 (50%) out of 6 at follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The test–retest reliability of the French version of the DERS is sufficiently applicable to the modified DERS total and subscale scores in autistic adults for the RCI calculation to be informative.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On "Goals" subscale, 2 (28%) of seven reported reliable improvement post-treatment and 3 (50%) of 6 at follow-up.

    “On the “Goals” subscale, reliable improvement was reported by 2 (28%) participants out of seven post-treatment and by 3 (50%) out of 6 at follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The test–retest reliability of the French version of the DERS is sufficiently applicable to the modified DERS total and subscale scores in autistic adults for the RCI calculation to be informative.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On "Non-acceptance" subscale, 2 (28%) of seven reported reliable improvement and one (14%) reported reliable worsening post-treatment.

    “Finally, on the “Non-acceptance” subscale, reliable improvement was reported by 2 (28%) participants out of seven and reliable worsening by one participant (14%) post-treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The test–retest reliability of the French version of the DERS is sufficiently applicable to the modified DERS total and subscale scores in autistic adults for the RCI calculation to be informative.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Theme (c): Skills learned were considered "useful", "diverse", "applicable" and "effective".

    “(c) the skills learned were considered “useful”, “diverse”, “applicable” and “effective”.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All participants reported increased depression and anxiety related to pandemic, and one lost a family member due to COVID-19.

    “Indeed, all of them reported increased depression and anxiety related to the pandemic, and one of them lost a family member due to COVID-19.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In only one participant, DERS total score did not improve, although self-harming behaviors did, with complete cessation post-treatment and at follow-up.

    “In only one participant, DERS total score did not improve, although self-harming behaviors did, with a complete cessation post-treatment and at follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Our sample was homogeneous in terms of ethnicity, as all participants were white Europeans.

    “Our sample was homogeneous in terms of ethnicity, however, as all participants were white Europeans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The intervention used in Hartmann et al. (2019) mainly targeted social communication difficulties, hence the in-session practices focused exclusively on social situations.

    “Importantly, the intervention used in the study by Hartmann et al. (2019) mainly targeted social communication difficulties, hence the in-session practices focused exclusively on social situations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hartmann et al., 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These studies have limitations: the severity of ED was not considered; individuals with severe comorbidities were excluded in Conner and White (2018) and those with suicidal ideation were excluded in Hartmann et al. (2019).

    “These studies have some limitations, however. First, the severity of the ED was not considered; second, individuals with severe comorbidities were excluded in the study by Conner and White (2018) and those with suicidal ideation were excluded in the study by Hartmann et al. (2019).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Conner & White, 2018 source
    • cites Hartmann et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    DBT has been found to be effective in several psychiatric disorders characterized by ED, e.g., complex post-traumatic stress disorder (c-PTSD), depression, anxiety and eating disorders.

    “In addition to BPD, DBT has been found to be effective in several psychiatric disorders characterized by ED, e.g., complex post-traumatic stress disorder (c-PTSD), depression, anxiety and eating disorders (Safer et al., 2001; Lynch et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2008; Harley et al., 2008; Bohus et al., 2013; Neacsiu et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Safer et al., 2001 source
    • cites Lynch et al., 2003 source
    • cites Chen et al., 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The first study (Conner & White, 2018) evaluated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a 6-week individual mindfulness intervention aiming to enhance emotion regulation abilities.

    “The first study (Conner & White, 2018) evaluated the feasibility and the preliminary efficacy of a 6-week individual mindfulness intervention aiming to enhance emotion regulation abilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Conner & White, 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The second study (Hartmann et al., 2019) assessed the effectiveness of a 12-week CBT- and DBT-informed group intervention aiming to enhance emotion regulation and social communication abilities.

    “The second study (Hartmann et al., 2019) assessed the effectiveness of a 12-week CBT- and DBT-informed group intervention aiming to enhance emotion regulation and social communication abilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hartmann et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some findings indicate that brief DBT formats (e.g. 6-month, 16-week) are effective in treating ED.

    “The optimal duration of DBT has been understudied, but some findings indicate that brief formats (e.g. 6-month, 16-week) are effective in treating ED (e.g. Koons et al., 2001; Stanley et al., 2007; Pasieczny & Connor, 2011; Neacsiu et al., 2014; Delparte et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Koons et al., 2001 source
    • cites Stanley et al., 2007 source
    • cites Pasieczny & Connor, 2011 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The efficacy of DBT has also been studied in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), suggesting its clinical pertinence in neurodevelopmental disorders.

    “In addition, the efficacy of DBT has also been studied in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Hirvikoski et al., 2011; Philipsen et al., 2014; Fleming et al., 2015), suggesting its clinical pertinence in neurodevelopmental disorders.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hirvikoski et al., 2011 source
    • cites Philipsen et al., 2014 source
    • cites Fleming et al., 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The internal consistency of the WHOQoL-BREF domains for baseline scores in the current sample was good (α = 0.83 physical, 0.94 psychological, 0.74 social, 0.85 environment).

    “The internal consistency of the WHOQoL-BREF domains for baseline scores in the current sample was good (α = 0.83 for the “Physical health” domain, α = 0.94 for the “Psychological health” domain, α = 0.74 for the “Social relationships” domain and α = 0.85 for the “Environment” domain).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    McVey et al. (2021) provided preliminary evidence for the utility of the DERS in autistic adolescents and adults, supporting a 6-factor structure similar to that found in the general population.

    “McVey et al. (2021) provided preliminary evidence for the utility of the DERS in autistic adolescents and adults. Their results supported a 6-factor structure, similar to that found in the general population (Gratz & Roemer, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites McVey et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gratz & Roemer, 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire for psychotherapeutic services (CSQ-8) has excellent psychometric properties when assessing psychotherapy outcomes.

    “The measure has excellent psychometric properties when assessing psychotherapy outcomes (Attkisson & Zwick, 1982; Sabourin et al., 1989).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Attkisson & Zwick, 1982 source
    • cites Sabourin et al., 1989 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) has adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.93), test-retest reliability (r = 0.88), and construct and predictive validity among a college sample.

    “The DERS has adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.93), test–retest reliability (r = 0.88), and construct and predictive validity among a college sample (Gratz & Roemer, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gratz & Roemer, 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Eight-item General Alexithymia Factor Score (GAFS-8) is the only alexithymia score to be thoroughly validated in the autistic population to date.

    “The GAFS-8 is the only alexithymia score to be thoroughly validated in the autistic population to date (Williams & Gotham, 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Williams & Gotham, 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In autistic adults, the BDI-II has strong reliability and validity, as well as a moderate ability to discriminate between depressed and non-depressed individuals.

    “In autistic adults, the BDI-II has strong reliability and validity, as well as a moderate ability to discriminate between depressed and non-depressed individuals (Williams et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Williams et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) has rarely been used to assess hopelessness in autistic individuals.

    “The BHS has rarely been used to assess hopelessness in autistic individuals (Cashin et al., 2013; Koegel et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cashin et al., 2013 source
    • cites Koegel et al., 2016 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The small sample size (n = 7) does not allow assuming normality of the data distribution, so the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used.

    “Given that the small sample size (n = 7) does not allow us to assume the normality of the data distribution, we used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Wilcoxon, 1945), a non-parametric alternative to the one-sample ttest, to analyze the preliminary efficacy outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wilcoxon, 1945 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hartmann et al. (2019) found no significant improvement in emotion regulation among autistic participants, but a significant improvement in social communication, which was a major focus of their treatment.

    “Their results showed no significant improvement in emotion regulation among autistic participants, but they found a significant improvement in social communication, which was a major focus of their treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hartmann et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the BHS has good psychometric properties.

    “In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the measure has good psychometric properties (e.g. Beck et al., 1974; Bouvard et al., 1992; Steed, 2001; Kliem et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Beck et al., 1974 source
    • cites Bouvard et al., 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Steed, 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Medication was unchanged during the study.

    “Medication was unchanged during the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The test-retest value from the French version does not consider minor modifications introduced in DERS total and subscale scores with autistic adults, so RCI calculation is approximate but informative.

    “We note that this test–retest value does not consider the minor modifications introduced in the calculation of DERS total score and subscale scores with autistic adults. The calculation of the RCIs is therefore approximate, nevertheless informative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dan-Glauser & Scherer, 2013 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The stability of the DERS has not yet been tested in autistic samples.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The test–retest reliability of the French version of the DERS is sufficiently applicable to the modified DERS total and subscale scores in autistic adults for the RCI calculation to be informative.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The WHOQoL-BREF has good psychometric properties.

    “The WHOQoL-BREF has good psychometric properties (Skevington et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Skevington et al., 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Meta-analysis on 144 studies showed that the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) has strong psychometric properties.

    “Meta-analysis on 144 studies showed that the BDI-II has strong psychometric properties (Erford et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Erford et al., 2016 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Inclusion criteria were a DERS total score above the cut-off of 96 at baseline reflecting severe ED and exhibiting self-harming and/or suicidal behaviors, including suicidal ideation, in the last year prior to the study.

    “In addition to a diagnosis of ASD without ID, adult participants had to meet the following two criteria to ensure that they fit the targeted severity: (a) having a DERS total score above the cut-off of 96 at baseline reflecting severe ED (Neaciu et al., 2014) and (b) exhibiting self-harming and/or suicidal behaviors, including suicidal ideation, in the last year prior to the study (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Neaciu et al., 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: The DERS cut-off of 96/97 validly identifies severe emotion dysregulation in autistic adults without ID.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Our results are the first to suggest that DBT might be feasible and clinically pertinent for autistic adults without ID presenting with self-harm and/or suicidal behaviors.

    “Importantly, our results are the first to suggest that DBT might be feasible and clinically pertinent for autistic adults without ID presenting with self-harm and/or suicidal behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    DBT was feasible and highly acceptable to participants.

    “Firstly, our results reveal that DBT was feasible and highly acceptable to participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Our results suggest that DBT is feasible and might be efficacious in reducing ED in this context.

    “Our results suggest that DBT is feasible and might be efficacious in reducing ED in this context.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Adherence to DBT was high and participants were highly satisfied with both group and individual sessions.

    “Indeed, adherence to DBT was high and participants were highly satisfied with both group and individual sessions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Participants' subjective experience of DBT was overall positive, including group skills training, individual sessions, and impact on building a life worth living.

    “Their subjective experience of DBT was overall positive, including group skills training, individual sessions, and the impact of DBT on building a life worth living.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Given significant improvement in DERS mean scores, acquisition of emotion regulation skills enabled participants to cope more effectively with stressful situations.

    “Given the significant improvement in DERS mean scores, we hypothesize that the acquisition of emotion regulation skills enabled participants to cope more effectively with stressful situations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In our sample, improvement observed on depression, hopelessness and quality of life was not sustained at follow-up due to effects of COVID-19 pandemic on participants' mental health.

    “In our sample, we hypothesize that the improvement observed on these dimensions was not sustained at follow-up due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the participants’ mental health.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This discrepancy might be explained by contextual factors: assessments were conducted while this participant was experiencing work-related problems and grieving loss of a family member.

    “This discrepancy might be explained by contextual factors: The post-treatment and the follow-up assessments were conducted while this participant was experiencing work-related problems and grieving the loss of a family member.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These discrepant outcomes are due to the "Clarity" mean score being impacted by worsening of scores in two participants at follow-up; one was grieving loss of a loved one at assessment.

    “These discrepant outcomes are due to the “Clarity” mean score which was impacted by the worsening of scores in two participants at follow-up; one of them was grieving the loss of a loved one at the time of the assessment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In France, as in other European countries, psychological care for autistic adults is still underdeveloped, despite government efforts in recent years.

    “Moreover, it should be noted that in France, as in other European countries, psychological care for autistic adults is still underdeveloped, despite government efforts in recent years (Micai et al., 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Micai et al., 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The significant improvement in mean score of "Awareness" subscale was not reflected in individual results, as only one of seven showed reliable improvement post-treatment and two of six at follow-up.

    “However, the significant improvement in the mean score of the “Awareness” subscale was not reflected in the individual results, as only one participant out of seven showed a reliable improvement post-treatment and two out of six at follow-up.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Our study is different from previous research due to approach based entirely on DBT and population of interest (autistic adults without ID exhibiting self-harm and/or suicidal behaviors associated with severe ED).

    “However, our study is different from previous research due to: (a) the approach adopted, based entirely on DBT, and (b) the population of interest, i.e., autistic adults without ID exhibiting self-harm and/or suicidal behaviors associated with severe ED.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This underdevelopment may have had an impact on subjective feedback of participants, as most were glad to have access to a psychological treatment conceived to address their specific needs.

    “This may have had an impact on the subjective feedback of the participants, as most of them were glad to have access to a psychological treatment conceived to address their specific needs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Regarding "Goals" and "Non-acceptance" subscales, skills related to these domains were less intensely addressed by the program than skills related to "Awareness", "Impulse" and "Strategies".

    “Regarding the “Goals” and”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    There was no control group, which does not allow providing definitive evidence that improvements found here are due to DBT.

    “Second, there was no control group, which does not allow providing definitive evidence that the improvements found here are due to DBT.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Our study is the first to assess feasibility, acceptability and clinical pertinence of DBT in autistic adults without ID.

    “Given that our study is the first to assess the feasibility, acceptability and clinical pertinence of DBT in autistic adults without ID, several limitations are to be noted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Alexithymia has rarely been measured in DBT protocols, and it is still unknown whether and how it changes in other clinical populations during DBT.

    “Alexithymia has rarely been measured in DBT protocols (Bianchini et al., 2019; Holmqvist Larsson et al., 2020), and it is still unknown whether and how it changes in other clinical populations during the course of DBT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bianchini et al., 2019 source
    • cites Holmqvist Larsson et al., 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These results highlight specific and robust impact of DBT on self-reported ED, which proved resilient despite highly stressful conditions related to pandemic.

    “These results highlight the specific and robust impact of DBT on self-reported ED, which proved resilient despite the highly stressful conditions related to the pandemic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Overall, our results are the first to suggest that DBT is feasible and provide preliminary evidence for its efficacy for treatment of severe ED in autistic adults without ID exhibiting self-harm and suicidal behaviors.

    “Overall, our results are the first to suggest that DBT is feasible and they provide preliminary evidence for its efficacy for the treatment of severe ED in autistic adults without ID exhibiting self-harm and suicidal behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The sample size (n = 7) was small, which does not allow generalizing results to target population.

    “First, the sample size (n = 7) was small, which does not allow generalizing the results to the target population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Since this was a feasibility trial, we favored feasibility-e.g., reduction of participants' social anxiety-over maximization of neutrality.

    “Indeed, since this was a feasibility trial, we favored feasibility—e.g., reduction of participants’ social anxiety—over the maximization of neutrality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Interviews and qualitative analysis were conducted by therapists involved in study, which might have interfered with neutrality required in process.

    “Sixth, the interviews and the qualitative analysis were conducted by the therapists involved in the study, which might have interfered with the neutrality required in the process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Study sample was heterogeneous in age, IQ, and severity of self-harm and suicidal behaviors, making it difficult to determine clinical characteristics of autistic adults that can benefit most from treatment.

    “Fourth, the study sample was heterogeneous in terms of age, IQ, and severity of self-harm and suicidal behaviors, making it difficult to determine the clinical characteristics of the autistic adults that can benefit the most from the treatment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is possible that participants became more aware of their emotions following DBT, but still had difficulties in labeling them, as well as flexibly orienting attention and imagination processes.

    “Hence, it is possible that the participants became more aware of their emotions following DBT, but they still had difficulties in labeling them, as well as flexibly orienting their attention and their imagination processes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Attention and imagination peculiarities are core difficulties found in autistic individuals, which were only marginally targeted by our DBT intervention.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These results bear important clinical relevance, given lack of evidence-based psychological treatments targeting specific needs of large number of autistic adults presenting with ED associated with self-harm and/or suicidal behaviors.

    “These results bear important clinical relevance, given the lack of evidence-based psychological treatments targeting the specific needs of a large number of autistic adults presenting with ED associated with self-harm and/or suicidal behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Duration of participation was heterogeneous (two patients completed half of therapy) due to dropouts caused by pandemic, which may have influenced outcomes.

    “Third, the duration of participation was heterogeneous (two patients completed half of the therapy) due to the dropouts caused by the pandemic, which may have influenced outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
117 of 117
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The COVID-19-related interruption of group sessions did not substantially affect the feasibility, acceptability, or preliminary efficacy of DBT.

    “DBT was initially scheduled for January 2020 to late May 2020. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, group sessions were interrupted mid-therapy (between March 2020 and June 2020), and the intervention ended in early August 2020.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire for psychotherapeutic services (CSQ-8) is a valid measure of satisfaction with psychotherapy in autistic adults without ID.

    “satisfaction measured quantitatively post-treatment using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire for psychotherapeutic services (CSQ-8; Sabourin et al., 1989), an 8-item questionnaire using a 4-point Likert scale (1 = not at all satisfied, 4 = completely satisfied) that assesses overall satisfaction with psychotherapeutic care received in inpatient or outpatient services. The measure has excellent”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The DERS cut-off of 96/97 validly identifies severe emotion dysregulation in autistic adults without ID.

    “In the absence of an official cut-off, we used the one by Neacsiu et al. (2014) to set the score of 97 as the threshold for severe ED.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The stability of the DERS has not yet been tested in autistic samples.

    “The stability of the DERS has not yet been tested in autistic samples, therefore we referred to the test–retest reliability of the French version (Dan-Glauser & Scherer, 2013).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Attention and imagination peculiarities are core difficulties found in autistic individuals, which were only marginally targeted by our DBT intervention.

    “Attention and imagination peculiarities are core difficulties found in autistic individuals, which were only marginally targeted by our DBT intervention.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The test–retest reliability of the French version of the DERS is sufficiently applicable to the modified DERS total and subscale scores in autistic adults for the RCI calculation to be informative.

    “We note that this test–retest value does not consider the minor modifications introduced in the calculation of DERS total score and subscale scores with autistic adults. The calculation of the RCIs is therefore approximate, nevertheless informative.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The DBT diary card self-reports of self-harm and suicidal behaviors are accurate.

    “The frequency of self-harm and suicidal behaviors, as well as the intensity of suicidal ideation, were tracked on the DBT diary card in which participants recorded their emotions, urges and target behaviors daily (Linehan, 1993).”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Assessment-completion statements conflict

    Minor

    The results say all seven participants completed all assessments, then identify a participant who lacked a follow-up measure.

  • Self-harm cessation percentage is overstated

    Minor

    Three of four participants is 75%, not the reported 80%.

    Reported 80 · recomputed 75

  • Assessment dates precede the intervention

    Minor

    The efficacy measures are dated January, June and August 2019, but the intervention was scheduled to begin in January 2020 and ended in August 2020. The stated post-treatment dates therefore precede treatment.

3 of 3

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.1186/s13229-021-00427-9

    Major

    The cited work was retracted on 2021-05-30 (notice 10.1186/s13229-021-00446-6), before this paper was published (2021-10-09). Its authors could have known.

    Cited work 10.1186/s13229-021-00427-9 · retracted 2021-05-30 · notice 10.1186/s13229-021-00446-6 · this paper published 2021-10-09

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.1186/s13229-021-00446-6

    Info

    The cited work was retracted; the date of the notice is not on record.

    Cited work 10.1186/s13229-021-00446-6 · retraction date not known · this paper published 2021-10-09

2 of 2

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 139 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Attwood, T. (2003). Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). In L. Holliday Willey (Ed.), Asperger Syndrome in Adolescence. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bemmouna, D., Coutelle, R., Weibel, S., & Weiner, L.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
Corresponding author
Bemmouna, Doha
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2021-10-09
Volume
52
Issue
10
Pages
4337-4354
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W3202632530
Cited by
64
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fondation FondaMental
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, autism spectrum disorder, self-harm, suicidal behavior, emotional dysregulation, treatment feasibility, treatment acceptability, preliminary efficacy, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Dialectical Behavior Therapy, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Behavior Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Self-Injurious Behavior, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-12.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review