Cited by 12Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale: Comprehensive Psychometric Study in a Spanish SUD Sample

Open access
Lozano, Óscar M., Carmona, José, Muñoz-Silva, Alicia, Fernández-Calderón, Fermín, Díaz-Batanero, Carmen, Sanchez-Garcia, Manuel·2020·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to provide reliability and validity evidence of the Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) scores on different versions and scoring procedures in a Spanish substance use disorder (SUD) sample. Method: The sample was made up of 170 outpatients diagnosed with SUD. The ASRS, the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), and the Substance Dependence Severity Scale were administered. Results: The results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed adequate fit to the structure proposed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV ) in the 18-item version. On the screening scale, best fit was found for a model with two correlated factors (inattention and hyperactivity). The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the ADHD items converge and are differentiated from symptoms of withdrawal. The regression analyses showed that severity of dependence is explained by the ASRS scores. Conclusion: Both versions of the ASRS showed adequate psychometric properties. The polytomous or dichotomous score is relevant in patient classification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054716664410

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The WMH collaborators have developed a screening scale based on follow-up analyses of WMH respondents in the USA, and this screening scale has been validated in a number of countries.

    “The WMH collaborators have developed a screening scale of this sort based on follow-up analyses of WMH respondents in the USA (Kessler et al. 2005), and this screening scale has been validated in a number of countries (e.g., Lozano et al. 2016; Morin et al. 2016; Sjolander et al. 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lozano, Ó. M., Carmona, J., Muñoz-Silva, A., Fernández-Calderón, F., Díaz-Batanero, C., & Sanchez-Garcia, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Huelva, Spain
  • Universidad de Huelva (ES)
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2016-08-22
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
1674-1684
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W2507480410
Cited by
12
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva (Universidad de Huelva) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva (Universidad de Huelva) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, adult ADHD, substance use disorders, psychometric properties, reliability and validity, inattention, hyperactivity, withdrawal symptoms, Spanish translation
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Substance-Related Disorders, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review