Neurobiological Basis of Reinforcement-Based Decision-Making in Adults With ADHD Treated With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to examine changes in the activation of the brain reward system following treatment with lisdexamfetamine (LDX) vs. placebo (PL) as a function of clinical improvement in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Methods: Twenty adults with ADHD were included in a randomized cross-over study. Participants underwent two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans, after receiving 3 to 5 weeks of treatment with both LDX and PL. During scanning, participants performed the passive-avoidance learning task to assess reward-related learning using computational variables (e.g., estimated value and prediction error). Pre-treatment to post-treatment symptom change was assessed via the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS). The imaging contrasts were Object Choose or Object Refuse during the object choice component of the task, modulated by expected value (reward vs. nonreward cue), and Reward vs. Punishment during feedback, modulated by prediction error (expected vs. actual outcome). To address the primary objective, we performed group-level mass univariate analyses between pre-treatment to post-treatment percent change of the ADHD-RS total scores and the four contrast images under the choice and feedback conditions, with significance set at a whole-brain voxel-wise threshold of p < .05 with family-wise error (FWE) correction and an extent (cluster) threshold of 50 contiguous voxels. Results: Improvement in ADHD symptoms was accompanied by significant increases of brain activation during the Object Refuse, Reward and Punishment contrasts in a widespread network including left caudate and putamen, and right orbitofrontal cortex (i.e., reward-related signaling) and left middle frontal, superior frontal, and precentral gyri (i.e., executive control). Conclusions: These findings are the first to show that the increase in responsiveness of systems engaged in reward processing with LDX treatment is positively related to symptom improvement. Results support the hypothesis that LDX treatment may restore balance to dysfunction (e.g., hypoactivation) within the brain reward circuitry in adults with ADHD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machado, J. M. D., & Novais, F. (2026) · Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40501-026-00392-1
- Authors
- Ivanov, I., Newcorn, J. H., Krone, B., Li, X., Duhoux, S., White, S. F., Schulz, K. P., Bédard, A. C. V., Pedraza, J., Adler, L. A., & Blair, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
- Tris Pharma (United States) (US)
- Boys Town National Research Hospital (US)
- University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- New York University (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Corresponding author
- Ivanov, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Attention Disorders
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-08-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1632-1633
- ISSN
- 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1246
- OpenAlex
- W3193058493
- Semantic Scholar
- 8b09617236477ec8e839d0ed956028dbeff3a523
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- adult ADHD, lisdexamfetamine, brain reward system, reinforcement learning, prediction error, expected value, caudate nucleus, putamen, orbitofrontal cortex, executive function, symptom improvement, stimulant medication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review