Cited by 1Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neurobiological Basis of Reinforcement-Based Decision-Making in Adults With ADHD Treated With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate

Ivanov, I., Newcorn, J. H., Krone, B., Li, X., Duhoux, S., White, S. F., Schulz, K. P., Bédard, A. C. V. +3 more·2021·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to examine changes in the activation of the brain reward system following treatment with lisdexamfetamine (LDX) vs. placebo (PL) as a function of clinical improvement in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Methods: Twenty adults with ADHD were included in a randomized cross-over study. Participants underwent two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans, after receiving 3 to 5 weeks of treatment with both LDX and PL. During scanning, participants performed the passive-avoidance learning task to assess reward-related learning using computational variables (e.g., estimated value and prediction error). Pre-treatment to post-treatment symptom change was assessed via the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS). The imaging contrasts were Object Choose or Object Refuse during the object choice component of the task, modulated by expected value (reward vs. nonreward cue), and Reward vs. Punishment during feedback, modulated by prediction error (expected vs. actual outcome). To address the primary objective, we performed group-level mass univariate analyses between pre-treatment to post-treatment percent change of the ADHD-RS total scores and the four contrast images under the choice and feedback conditions, with significance set at a whole-brain voxel-wise threshold of p < .05 with family-wise error (FWE) correction and an extent (cluster) threshold of 50 contiguous voxels. Results: Improvement in ADHD symptoms was accompanied by significant increases of brain activation during the Object Refuse, Reward and Punishment contrasts in a widespread network including left caudate and putamen, and right orbitofrontal cortex (i.e., reward-related signaling) and left middle frontal, superior frontal, and precentral gyri (i.e., executive control). Conclusions: These findings are the first to show that the increase in responsiveness of systems engaged in reward processing with LDX treatment is positively related to symptom improvement. Results support the hypothesis that LDX treatment may restore balance to dysfunction (e.g., hypoactivation) within the brain reward circuitry in adults with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1087054720923061

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ivanov, I., Newcorn, J. H., Krone, B., Li, X., Duhoux, S., White, S. F., Schulz, K. P., Bédard, A. C. V., Pedraza, J., Adler, L. A., & Blair, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
  • Tris Pharma (United States) (US)
  • Boys Town National Research Hospital (US)
  • University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • New York University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Corresponding author
Ivanov, I.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2021-08-06
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
1632-1633
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W3193058493
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
adult ADHD, lisdexamfetamine, brain reward system, reinforcement learning, prediction error, expected value, caudate nucleus, putamen, orbitofrontal cortex, executive function, symptom improvement, stimulant medication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review