Cited by 17Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

ADHD in Adults: Does Age at Diagnosis Matter?

Hutt Vater, Chloe, DiSalvo, Maura, Ehrlich, Alyssa, Parker, Haley, O’Connor, Hannah, Faraone, Stephen V., Biederman, Joseph·2024·Journal of Attention Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide additional information about clinical features associated with adult ADHD in patients diagnosed in childhood compared to those first diagnosed in adulthood. METHOD: We stratified a sample of adults with ADHD into patients diagnosed in childhood versus adulthood and compared demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: We found similar clinical features in adults diagnosed in childhood and adults diagnosed in adulthood. Among those diagnosed in adulthood, 95% reported symptom onset in youth. Our results do not support the hypothesis that ADHD diagnosed in adulthood is due to misinterpreting symptoms of other disorders as ADHD. They also suggest incorporating behavioral signs of executive dysfunction into diagnostic criteria for ADHD in adults may increase diagnostic sensitivity. CONCLUSION: These results support the validity of ADHD diagnoses in adulthood, as these adults show similar clinical profiles to those diagnosed in youth. Our results also suggest that if adult-onset ADHD exists, it is rare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10870547231218450

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Study design elements, including cross-sectional versus longitudinal methodologies, influence the interpretation of ADHD prevalence.

    “study design elements, including cross-sectional versus longitudinal methodologies, influence the interpretation of ADHD prevalence by either capturing a snapshot or longitudinal persistence of symptoms”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutt Vater, C., DiSalvo, M., Ehrlich, A., Parker, H., O’Connor, H., Faraone, S. V., & Biederman, J.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Faraone, Stephen V.
Venue
Journal of Attention Disorders
Published
2024-01-02
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
614-624
ISSN
  • 1087-0547 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1246
OpenAlex
W4390541203
Cited by
17
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Attention Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
MGH Pediatric Psychopharmacology Council Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
adult ADHD, age at diagnosis, childhood-onset ADHD, adult-onset ADHD, executive dysfunction, diagnostic validity, symptom onset, misdiagnosis, diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Humans, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review