Cited by 323Personality Traits and PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Do People Embrace Praise Even When They Feel Unworthy? A Review of Critical Tests of Self-Enhancement Versus Self-Verification

Kwang, Tracy, Swann, William B.·2010·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

Some contemporary theorists contend that the desire for self-enhancement is prepotent and more powerful than rival motives such as self-verification. If so, then even people with negative self-views will embrace positive evaluations. The authors tested this proposition by conducting a meta-analytic review of the relevant literature. The data provided ample evidence of self-enhancement strivings but little evidence of its prepotency. Instead, the evidence suggested that both motives are influential but control different response classes. In addition, other motives may sometimes come into play. For example, when rejection risk is high, people seem to abandon self-verification strivings, apparently in an effort to gratify their desire for communion. However, when rejection risk is low, as is the case in many secure marital relationships, people prefer self-verifying evaluations. The authors conclude that future researchers should broaden the bandwidth of their explanatory frameworks to include motives other than self-enhancement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868310365876

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human beings possess a motivation to self-verify, that is, to seek out and accept input from others that confirms their already formed view of self.

    “Human beings possess a motivation to self-verify -that is, to seek out and accept input from others that confirms their already formed view of self (Kwang & Swann, 2010).”

    From Self and identity in personality psychology (2021) · cites this paper as Kwang & Swann, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwang, T., & Swann, W. B.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Swann, William B.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2010-04-30
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
263-280
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2117142350
Cited by
323
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-enhancement, self-verification, self-worth, rejection risk, marital relationships, interpersonal evaluation, self-concept
MeSH terms
Affect, Humans, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Motivation, Reinforcement, Psychology, Rejection, Psychology, Self Concept, Feedback, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review