Cited by 24Community Health and DevelopmentPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Health Policies and Education

Ecological Contexts in the Development of Coalitions for Youth Violence Prevention: An Organizational Network Analysis

Bess, Kimberly D., Speer, Paul W., Perkins, Douglas D.·2012·Health Education & Behavior

Abstract

Community coalitions are a recognized strategy for addressing pressing public health problems. Despite the promise of coalitions as an effective prevention strategy, results linking coalition efforts to positive community outcomes are mixed. To date, research has primarily focused on determining organizational attributes related to successful internal coalition functioning. The authors’ research complements and adds to this literature by offering a network conceptualization of coalition formation in which coalition participation is studied within the broader context of local organizational networks both within and beyond a coalition. The authors examine participation in the first year of a youth violence prevention coalition exploring both differences between participating and nonparticipating organizations and levels of participation. Each network variable, reflecting prior collaboration and being viewed by other organizations as a local leader, approximately doubled the explained variance in coalition participation beyond the predictive power of all available organizational attributes combined. Results suggest that initial coalition participation emerged out of a preexisting network of interorganizational relations and provide an alternative perspective on coalition formation that goes beyond conceptual orientations that treat coalitions as bounded organizational entities that exist apart from the communities in which they are embedded.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1090198111419656

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial coalition participation in a youth violence prevention program was associated with a pre-existing network of inter-organizational relations.

    “Bess and colleagues [38] found that initial coalition participation in a youth violence prevention program was associated with a pre-existing network of inter-organizational relations.”

    From Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation (2015) · cites this paper as [38]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bess, K. D., Speer, P. W., & Perkins, D. D.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Health Education & Behavior
Published
2011-10-14
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
526-537
ISSN
  • 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6127
OpenAlex
W2132338786
Cited by
24
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5U49CE001022)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
community coalitions, youth violence prevention, coalition formation, interorganizational networks, organizational networks, local leadership, public health partnerships, ecological context
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Humans, Tennessee, Violence, Program Development, Community Networks, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review