Cited by 12Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionObesity, Physical Activity, DietPhysical Activity and Health

Bullied status and physical activity in Texas adolescents

Case, Kathleen R., Pérez, Adriana, Saxton, Debra L., Hoelscher, Deanna M., Springer, Andrew E.·2016·Health Education & Behavior

Abstract

This study examined the association between having been bullied at school during the past 6 months ("bullied status") and not meeting physical activity (PA) recommendations of 60 minutes of daily PA during the past week among 8th- and 11th-grade Texas adolescents. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine this association, adjusted for weight status, grade, race/ethnicity, and stratified by gender; furthermore, a significant interaction was found between bullied status and weight status. Results are presented by interaction status. Results indicated that overweight girls who reported never being bullied, as well as those who reported being bullied more than twice, had higher odds of not meeting PA recommendations than normal weight girls who were never bullied (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI: 1.12, 3.99]; AOR = 9.18, 95% CI [2.26, 37.27], respectively). Obese girls who were bullied once or twice had higher odds of not meeting PA recommendations than normal weight girls who were never bullied (AOR = 2.89, 95% CI [1.06, 7.89]). Overweight boys who reported never being bullied had lower odds of not meeting PA recommendations than normal weight boys who were never bullied (AOR = 0.62, 95% CI [0.39, 0.97]). Conversely, obese boys who were bullied once or twice reported higher odds of not meeting PA recommendations than normal weight boys who were never bullied (AOR = 3.61, 95% CI [1.22, 10.67]). Findings from this study indicate…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1090198115599986

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Case, K. R., Pérez, A., Saxton, D. L., Hoelscher, D. M., & Springer, A. E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Texas Department of State Health Services (US)
Corresponding author
Case, Kathleen R.
Venue
Health Education & Behavior
Published
2015-08-24
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
313-320
ISSN
  • 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6127
OpenAlex
W1200279401
Cited by
11
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P20MD000170)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
school bullying, physical activity, adolescents, overweight, obesity, weight status, gender differences, physical activity guidelines, Texas
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, School Health Services, Texas, Health Behavior, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models, Sex Distribution, Overweight, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review