Cited by 24Behavioral Health and InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMedia Influence and Health

Mental contrasting with implementation intentions reduces drinking when drinking is hazardous: an online self-regulation intervention

Open access
Wittleder, Sandra, Kappes, Andreas, Oettingen, Gabriele, Gollwitzer, Peter M., Jay, Melanie, Morgenstern, Jon·2019·Health Education & Behavior

Abstract

Introduction. Drinking alcohol has detrimental health consequences, and effective interventions to reduce hazardous drinking are needed. The self-regulation intervention of Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions (MCII) promotes behavior change across a variety of health behaviors. In this study, we tested if online delivery of MCII reduced hazardous drinking in people who were worried about their drinking. Method. Participants ( N = 200, female = 107) were recruited online. They were randomized to learn MCII or solve simple math problems (control). Results. Immediately after the intervention, participants in the MCII condition (vs. control) reported an increased commitment to reduce drinking. After 1 month, they reported having taken action measured by the Readiness to Change drinking scale. When drinking was hazardous (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test ≥ 8, n = 85), participants in the MCII condition indicated a decreased number of drinking days, exp(β) = 0.47, CI (confidence interval) [−1.322, −.207], p = .02, and drinks per week, exp(β) = 0.57, CI [0.94, 5.514], p = .007, compared with the control condition. Discussion. These findings demonstrate that a brief, self-guided online intervention ( Mdn = 28 minutes) can reduce drinking in people who worry about their drinking. Our findings show a higher impact in people at risk for hazardous drinking. Conclusion. MCII is scalable as an online intervention. Future studies should test the cost-effectiveness of the intervention in real-world settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1090198119826284

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wittleder et al. (2019) found MCII decreased the number of drinking days for people with hazardous drinking behavior but not for people with non-hazardous drinking behavior, compared to control.

    “Wittleder et al. (2019) found that MCII decreased the number of drinking days for people with hazardous drinking behavior, but not for people with non-hazardous drinking behavior, compared to the control group.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Adriaanse, M. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., De Ridder, D. T. D., de Wit, J. B. F., & Kroese, F. M. (2011). Breaking habits with implemen- tation intentions: A test of underlying processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 502-512.
  2. Adriaanse, M. A., Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., Hennes, E. P., De Ridder, D. T. D., & De Wit, J. B. F. (2010). When planning is not enough: Fighting unhealthy snacking habits by Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions (MCII). European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1277-1293.
  3. Ahacic, K., Nederfeldt, L., & Helgason, A. R. (2014). The national alcohol helpline in Sweden: An evaluation of its first year. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 9, 28. doi:10.1186/1747-597X-9-28 · DOI
  4. Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2001). AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence.
  5. Balhara, Y., & Verma, R. (2014). A review of web based interven- tions focusing on alcohol use. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 4, 472-480.
  6. Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  7. Brandstätter, V., Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 946-960.
  8. Cunningham, J. A., & van Mierlo, T. (2009). Methodological issues of Internet-based interventions for problem drinking. Drug and Alcohol Review, 28, 12-17.
  9. Edwards, G., Arif, A., & Hodgson, R. (1981). Nomenclature and clas- sification of drug and alcohol-related problems: A WHO memo- randum. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 59, 225-242.
  10. Elliot, J. C., Carey, K. B., & Bolles, J. R. (2008). Computer-based interventions for college drinking: A qualitative review. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 994-1005.
  11. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2009). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  12. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), The handbook of motiva- tion and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53-92). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  13. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 141-185.
  14. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  15. Kappes, A., & Oettingen, G. (2014). The emergence of goal pur- suit: Mental contrasting connects future and reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 25-39.
  16. Kappes, A., Singmann, H., & Oettingen, G. (2012). Mental con- trasting instigates goal pursuit by linking obstacles of reality with instrumental behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 811-818.
  17. Kappes, A., Wendt, M., Reinelt, T., & Oettingen, G. (2013). Mental contrasting changes the meaning of reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 797-810.
  18. Kirk, D., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2011). Mental con- trasting promotes integrative bargaining. International Journal of Conflict Management, 22, 324-341.
  19. Miles, J. D., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Improving performance through implementation intentions: Are preexisting response biases replaced? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1105- 1110.
  20. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  21. Oettingen, G. (2012). Future thought and behavior change. European Review of Social Psychology, 23, 1-63.
  22. Oettingen, G. (2014). Rethinking positive thinking: Inside the new science of motivation. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.
  23. Oettingen, G., Kappes, H. B., Guttenberg, K. B., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2015). Self-regulation of time management: Mental con- trasting with implementation intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 218-229.
  24. Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2010). Strategies of setting and implementing goals: Mental contrasting and implementation intentions. In J. E. Maddux & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Social psy- chological foundations of clinical psychology (pp. 114-135). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  25. Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2018). Health behavior change by self-regulation of goal pursuit. In D. de Ridder, M. Adriaanse & K. Fujita (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of self-control in health and well-being (pp. 418-430). New York, NY: Routledge.
  26. Oettingen, G., Mayer, D., Sevincer, T. A., Stephens, E. J., Pak, H.- J., & Hagenah, M. (2009). Mental contrasting and goal com- mitment: The mediating role of energization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 608-622.
  27. Oettingen, G., Pak, H., & Schnetter, K. (2001). Self-regulation of goal setting: Turning free fantasies about the future into binding goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 736-753.
  28. Sheeran, P., Webb, T. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005). The inter- play between goal intentions and implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 87-98.
  29. Sobell, L., & Sobell, M. (1992). Timeline follow-back: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In J. Allen & R. Z. Litten (Eds.). Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biochemical methods (pp. 41-72). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.
  30. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statis- tics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  31. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249-268.
  32. Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2008). Mechanisms of implementa- tion intention effects: The role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 373-395.
  33. World Health Organization. (2014). Global status report on non- communicable diseases 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press.
  34. Zhou, H., & Fishbach, A. (2016). The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surpris- ing (yet false) research conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 493-504.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wittleder, S., Kappes, A., Oettingen, G., Gollwitzer, P. M., Jay, M., & Morgenstern, J.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • Northwell Health (US)
Corresponding author
Wittleder, Sandra
Venue
Health Education & Behavior
Published
2019-03-05
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
666-676
ISSN
  • 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6127
OpenAlex
W2921688548
Cited by
24
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Education & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
mental contrasting with implementation intentions, hazardous drinking, alcohol consumption, self-regulation interventions, online intervention, self-guided intervention, readiness to change, alcoholism, behavior change
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review