Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 975

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Construct Validation of the Health Belief Model

Cummings, K. Michael, Jette, Alan M., Rosenstock, Irwin M.·1978·Health Education Monographs

Abstract

A multitrait-multimethod design was employed to assess the construct validity of the Health Belief Model. The data were obtained from a non-representative sample of 85 graduate students at The University of Michigan's School of Public Health. The traits consisted of the respondents' perceptions of: health interest, locus of control, susceptibility to influenza, severity of influenza, benefits provided by a flu shot, and the barriers or costs associated with getting a flu shot. Each trait was measured by three methods: a seven-point Likert scale, a fixed-alternative multiple choice scale, and a vignette. The results indicate that the Health Belief Model variables can be measured with a substantial amount of convergent validity using Likert or multiple choice questionnaire items. With regard to discriminant validity, evidence suggests that subjects' perceptions of barriers and benefits are quite different from their perceptions of susceptibility and severity. Perceptions of susceptibility and severity are substantially but not entirely independent. Perceived benefits and barriers demonstrate a strong negative relationship which suggests the possibility that these two variables represent opposite ends of a single continuum and not separate health beliefs. These preliminary results provide the basis for developing brief health belief scales that may be administered to samples of consumers and providers to assess educational needs. Such needs assessment, in turn, could then be used to tailor messages and programs to meet the particular needs of a client group.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/109019817800600406

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. 10.1007/BF00286161 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Becker M, 1974, Health Educ Monogr, 2, 236, 10.1177/109019817400200308 · doi:10.1177/109019817400200308
  3. 10.1097/00005650-197501000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Jackson ON, 1969, Psychol Bull, 29, 259
  5. Jöreskog KG, 1972, LISREL: A General Computer Program for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System Involving Multiple Indicators of Unmeasured Variables
  6. Jöreskog KG, 1973, Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences
  7. 10.1037/h0030412 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/109019817700500303 · DOI

Cited by

See all 975

Metadata

Authors
Cummings, K. M., Jette, A. M., & Rosenstock, I. M.
Venue
Health Education Monographs
Published
1978-12
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
394-405
ISSN
0073-1455 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994394210
Cited by
975
References
1
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Construct Validation of the Health Belief Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/109019817800600406
The paper
Cummings, K. M., Jette, A. M., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1978). Construct Validation of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817800600406

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.