The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construct Validation of the Health Belief Model
Abstract
A multitrait-multimethod design was employed to assess the construct validity of the Health Belief Model. The data were obtained from a non-representative sample of 85 graduate students at The University of Michigan's School of Public Health. The traits consisted of the respondents' perceptions of: health interest, locus of control, susceptibility to influenza, severity of influenza, benefits provided by a flu shot, and the barriers or costs associated with getting a flu shot. Each trait was measured by three methods: a seven-point Likert scale, a fixed-alternative multiple choice scale, and a vignette. The results indicate that the Health Belief Model variables can be measured with a substantial amount of convergent validity using Likert or multiple choice questionnaire items. With regard to discriminant validity, evidence suggests that subjects' perceptions of barriers and benefits are quite different from their perceptions of susceptibility and severity. Perceptions of susceptibility and severity are substantially but not entirely independent. Perceived benefits and barriers demonstrate a strong negative relationship which suggests the possibility that these two variables represent opposite ends of a single continuum and not separate health beliefs. These preliminary results provide the basis for developing brief health belief scales that may be administered to samples of consumers and providers to assess educational needs. Such needs assessment, in turn, could then be used to tailor messages and programs to meet the particular needs of a client group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1007/BF00286161 · DOI · Paper page
- Becker M, 1974, Health Educ Monogr, 2, 236, 10.1177/109019817400200308 · doi:10.1177/109019817400200308
- 10.1097/00005650-197501000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- Jackson ON, 1969, Psychol Bull, 29, 259
- Jöreskog KG, 1972, LISREL: A General Computer Program for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System Involving Multiple Indicators of Unmeasured Variables
- Jöreskog KG, 1973, Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences
- 10.1037/h0030412 · DOI
- 10.1177/109019817700500303 · DOI
Cited by
Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis.
Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142 · Cited by 1,769
Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories
Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0039729 · Cited by 1,315
Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task?
Riley, W. T., Rivera, D. E., Atienza, A. A., Nilsen, W., Allison, S. M., & Mermelstein, R. (2011) · Translational Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7 · Cited by 978
Albarracín, D., Gillette, J. C., Earl, A. N., Glasman, L. R., Durantini, M. R., & Ho, M.-H. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856 · Cited by 792
Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2020) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620934692 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Cummings, K. M., Jette, A. M., & Rosenstock, I. M.
- Venue
- Health Education Monographs
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1978-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 394-405
- ISSN
- 0073-1455 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994394210
- Cited by
- 975
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Construct Validation of the Health Belief Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/109019817800600406
- The paper
- Cummings, K. M., Jette, A. M., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1978). Construct Validation of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817800600406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.