CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 115Public Health Policies and EducationSchool Health and Nursing EducationCommunity Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Settings as an Important Dimension in Health Education/Promotion Policy, Programs, and Research

Mullen, Patricia Dolan, Evans, David, Forster, Jean, Gottlieb, Nell H., Kreuter, Matt, Moon, Robert, O'Rourke, Thomas, Strecher, Victor J.·1995·Health Education Quarterly
DOI 10.1177/109019819402200306
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Settings—community, worksite, schools, and healthcare sites—constitute an important dimension of health education/health promotion policy and programs and for research about program needs, feasibility, efficacy, and effectiveness. These settings vary in the extent of coverage of and relationships with their respective constituencies, valued outcomes, and quantity and quality of evidence about the effectiveness of setting-specific and cross-setting programs. Main sources of evidence for program efficacy and effectiveness are summarized, leading to the conclusion that strides have been made toward building a strong evidentiary base for health education/health promotion in these settings. Gaps in research exist, especially for diffusion of effective programs, new technologies, the influence of policy, relations between settings, and approaches to marginal and special subgroups. Recommendations are offered for cross-setting and within-setting research related to intervention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/109019819402200306

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Skretney MT, 1990, N Y State J Med, 90, 54
  2. 10.1001/jama.1991.03470220084032 · DOI
  3. 1992, Stopping Teenage Addiction to Tobacco: Stopping Teenage Addiction to Tobacco, a Community Organizer's Manual
  4. Health Promotion Resource Center, North Bay Health Resources Center, 1992, Tobacco free youth: How to reduce sales to minors in your community
  5. Wolfson M., Presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Los Angeles, CA, August 1994
  6. Wagenaar AC, J Community Psychol
  7. Corbett K., 1992, Mobilizing communities to stop teenage addiction to tobacco: A process evaluation of STAT's four community projects
  8. U.S. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 1993, School Health: Findings From Evaluated Programs
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1991, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, 40, 113
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1994, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, 43, 1
  11. Kirby D., 1994, Public Health Rep, 109, 339
  12. O'Donnell MP, 1994, Employers' financial perspective on health promotion
  13. 10.1001/jama.1992.03490060081028 · DOI
  14. Mullen PD, 1987, Rheumatol, 14, S33
  15. Garrity TF, 1985, Hypertension, 3, S91
  16. Mullen PD, A meta-analysis of trials evaluating patient education and counseling for three groups of preventive behaviors
  17. Mullen PD, 1993, Proving and improving patient education programs: Contributions of research reviews
  18. Strecher VJ, 1994, J Fam Pract, 39, 262
  19. Kreuter MW, Health Educ Res: Theory and Practice
  20. Hall G., 1992, Educ Res Perspectives, 19, 95
  21. Green LW, Gottlieb NH, Parcel G.: Diffusion theory extended and applied, in Ward W, Lewis FM (eds.): Advances in Health Education and Promotion (Vol. 3). London, Jessica Kinglsey, 1991, pp. 91-117.
  22. Gottlieb NH, 1994, Using PRECEDE/PROCEED for implementation planning: Diffusion of the Texas "Top Priority" worksite health promotion program
  23. Gingiss PL, 1994, J Dnsg Educ, 24, 163
  24. Parcel GS, Health Educ Res

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 115

Related

Metadata

Authors
Mullen, P. D., Evans, D., Forster, J., Gottlieb, N. H., Kreuter, M., Moon, R., O'Rourke, T., & Strecher, V. J.
Affiliations
  • Center for Health Promotion, Research, and Development, School of Public Health, University of Texas
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Saint Louis University (ES)
  • Montana Department of Environmental Quality (US)
  • Department of Community Health, University of Illinois
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
ORCID
Venue
Health Education Quarterly
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1995-08
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
329-345
ISSN
0195-8402 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1177/109019819402200306
OpenAlex
W2058183076
Cited by
115
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
15.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Health Education Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
Keywords
health education, health promotion, setting, community settings, school environment, healthcare settings, program efficacy, program effectiveness, evidence base, health promotion policy, intervention research
MeSH terms
Community Health Services, Health Education, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Health Services Research, Humans, Life Style, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Social Environment, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review