Cited by 666Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBehavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and Health

Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings.

Open access
Campbell, M K, DeVellis, B M, Strecher, V J, Ammerman, A S, DeVellis, R F, Sandler, R S·1994·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. To achieve the Healthy People 2000 objectives, public health professionals must develop effective dietary interventions that address psychosocial and behavioral components of change. This study tested the effect of individually computer-tailored messages designed to decrease fat intake and increase fruit and vegetable intake. METHODS. Adult patients from four North Carolina family practices were surveyed at baseline and then randomly assigned to one of two interventions or to a control group. The first intervention consisted of individually computer-tailored nutrition messages; the second consisted of nontailored nutrition information based on the 1990 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Patients were resurveyed 4 months postintervention. RESULTS. The tailored intervention produced significant decreases in total fat and saturated fat scores compared with those of the control group (P < .05). Total fat was decreased in the tailored group by 23%, in the nontailored group by 9%, and in the control group by 3%. Fruit and vegetable consumption did not increase in any study group. Seventy-three percent of the tailored intervention group recalled receiving a message, compared with 33% of the nontailored intervention group. CONCLUSIONS. Tailored nutrition messages are effective in promoting dietary fat reduction for disease prevention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.84.5.783

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [2]2. Prochaska J. A transtheoretical model of behavior change: implications for diet interventions. In: Henderson M, Bowen D, DeRoos K, eds. Promoting Dietary Change in Communities: Appying EDsting Models of Dietary Change to Population-Based Interven- tions. Seattle, Wash: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; 1992:37-50.
  2. [7]7. Pennington J, Church H. Bowes and Church's Food Values of Pordons Com- monly Used. 15th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott; 1989.
  3. [10]10. Campbell MK The Impact of Message Tailoring on Nutridon Behavior Change for Disease Prevention. Chapel Hill, NC: Univer- sity of North Carolina; 1992. Dissertation.
  4. [11]11. Becker M, ed. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:324-508.
  5. [12]12. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guide- lines for Americans. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: US Dept of Agriculture and US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1990. Home and Garden Bulletin 232.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, M. K., DeVellis, B. M., Strecher, V. J., Ammerman, A. S., DeVellis, R. F., & Sandler, R. S.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
1994-05
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
783-787
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2168181523
Cited by
666
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 16
FWCI
21.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
dietary behavior change, fat intake reduction, saturated fat, fruit and vegetable intake, nutrition education, primary care, general practice, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, message recall, Healthy People 2000, disease prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Diet, Dietary Fats, Family Practice, Feeding Behavior, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review