The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Application of DICTION to Content Analysis Research in Strategic Management
Abstract
DICTION is a computer-aided content analysis program grounded in a number of theoretical bases in linguistic research. DICTION has a number of attractive features that could be used to analyze unique elements of language in narrative texts germane to strategic management research. The authors apply the DICTION software to a sample of mission statements from 408 Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business colleges of business with a focus on gaining insights concerning how DICTION can be used in strategic management research utilizing content analysis. They find significant differences in word usage in mission statements based on organizational characteristics, including business school performance. They conclude with suggestions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286 · cited 2×
“These include texts concerning content analysis in general (Krippendorf, 2004; Neuendorf, 2002; Weber, 1990), texts that specifically address computer-aided techniques (Alexa & Zuell, 1999; Kelle, 1995), and a number of published articles outlining content analysis procedures, comparing techniques and/or different sof…”
MethodWeber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131004 · Cited by 1,290
A Communitarian Note on Stakeholder Theory
Etzioni, A. (1998) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3857547 · Cited by 118 · cited 1×
“More recently, Etzioni (1998) argued that the communitarian concepts have much in common with elements of stakeholder theory.”
Background
Cited by
Sentiment strength detection in short informal text
Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., & Kappas, A. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21416 · Cited by 1,449
Short, J. C., Broberg, J. C., Cogliser, C. C., & Brigham, K. H. (2010) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109335949 · Cited by 644
Self-citationKrishen, A. S., Raschke, R. L., Close, A. G., & Kachroo, P. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.12.002 · Cited by 64
Do (women’s) words matter? The influence of gendered language in entrepreneurial pitching
Balachandra, L., Fischer, K., & Brush, C. (2021) · Journal of Business Venturing Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00224 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Short, J. C., & Palmer, T. B.
- Venue
- Organizational Research Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-11-28
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 727-752
- ISSN
- 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7425
- OpenAlex
- W2140144518
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 45.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Application of DICTION to Content Analysis Research in Strategic Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1094428107304534
- The paper
- Short, J. C., & Palmer, T. B. (2008). The Application of DICTION to Content Analysis Research in Strategic Management. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107304534
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
