The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Experience Sampling Methodology to Advance Entrepreneurship Theory and Research
Open accessAbstract
The authors propose the use of experience sampling methodology (ESM) as an innovative methodological approach to address critical questions in entrepreneurship research. ESM requires participants to provide reports of their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors at multiple times across situations as they happen in the natural environment. Thus, ESM allows researchers to capture dynamic person-by-situation interactions as well as between- and within-person processes, improve the ecological validity of results, and minimize retrospective biases. The authors provide a step-by-step description of how to design and implement ESM studies beginning with research design and ending with data analysis, and including issues of implementation such as time and resources needed, participant recruitment and orientation, signaling procedures, and the use of computerized devices and wireless technologies. The authors also describe a cell phone ESM protocol that enables researchers to monitor and interact with participants in real time, reduces costs, expedites data entry, and increases convenience. Finally, the authors discuss implications of ESMbased research for entrepreneurs, business incubators, and entrepreneurship educators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).
Forgas, J. P. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39 · Cited by 3,470
The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions.
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265 · Cited by 2,996
Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method
CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M., & LARSON, R. (1987) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004 · Cited by 2,544
Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 · Cited by 1,806
Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J., & Pierce, C. A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.94 · Cited by 1,216
Self-citationHektner, J., Schmidt, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007) · doi:10.4135/9781412984201 · Cited by 1,174
Cited by
Beal, D. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111335 · Cited by 436
scientific contributions of within-person research in management: Making the juice worth the squeeze
McCormick, B. W., Reeves, C. J., Downes, P. E., Li, N., & Ilies, R. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318788435 · Cited by 194
Having a creative day: understanding entrepreneurs' daily idea generation through a recovery lens
Weinberger, E., Wach, D., Stephan, U., & Wegge, J. (2018) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.001 · Cited by 181
Empowering Leadership and Effective Collaboration in Geographically Dispersed Teams
Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12108 · Cited by 170
Leading day-to-day: A review of the daily causes and consequences of leadership behaviors
Kelemen, T. K., Matthews, S. H., & Breevaart, K. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101344 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Uy, M. A., Foo, M.-D., & Aguinis, H.
- Venue
- Organizational Research Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-08-20
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-54
- ISSN
- 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7425
- OpenAlex
- W2126474382
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 15.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.