Cited by 155Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLeadership and Management in OrganizationsTeam Dynamics and Performance

Leading day-to-day: A review of the daily causes and consequences of leadership behaviors

Open access
Kelemen, Thomas K., Matthews, Samuel H., Breevaart, Kimberley·2020·The Leadership Quarterly

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101344

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By reviewing the extant literature on leadership, the authors found that levels of analysis, ranked from most to least frequent, are between-person, group, organization, dyad, and within-person.

    “By reviewing the extant literature on leadership, we found that levels of analysis, ranked from most to least frequent, are between-person, group, organization, dyad, and within-person (Kelemen et al., 2020; Yammarino et al., 2005).”

    From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Kelemen et al., 2020

    The “Within-person approach to leadership” section (page unavailable) says existing leadership research primarily focuses on the between-person level and contrasts it with daily within-person research. That supports the first-ranked level, but the paper does not give the claimed frequency ranking of group, organization, dyad, and within-person analyses. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In recent years, a notable trend in leadership literature involves investigating leadership at the within-person level.

    “In recent years, a notable trend in leadership literature involves investigating leadership at the within-person level (i.e., daily leadership behaviors, Kelemen et al., 2020).”

    From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Kelemen et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [32]32. Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. E. (2011). Personality research. In M. R. Mehl, & T. S. Conner (Eds.). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 525-538). New York: Guilford Press.
  2. [47]47. Jones, M. C., & Johnston, D. (2013). Do mood and the receipt of work-based support influence nurse perceived quality of care delivery? A behavioural diary study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(5-6), 890-901.
  3. [99]99. Sherf, E. N., Venkataramani, V., & Gajendran, R. S. (2019). Too busy to be fair? Academy of Management Journal: The effect of workload and rewards on managers' justice rule adherence. *
  4. [105]105. Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123-152.
  5. [124]124. Yeung, E., & Shen, W. (2019). Can pride be a vice and virtue at work? Journal of Organizational Behavior: Associations between authentic and hubristic pride and leadership behaviors.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelemen, T. K., Matthews, S. H., & Breevaart, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of Northern Iowa (US)
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Kelemen, Thomas K.
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
101344
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990216146
Cited by
155
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7
FWCI
21.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
leadership behavior, within-person variability, leadership process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review