The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the Dimensions of Organizational Performance: A Construct Validity Study
Abstract
Organizational performance is a fundamental construct in strategic management. Recently, researchers proposed a framework for organizational performance that includes three dimensions: accounting returns, growth, and stock market performance. We test the construct validity of indicators of these dimensions by examining reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and nomological validity. We conduct a confirmatory factor analysis with 19 analytically derived indicators on a sample of 37,262 firm-years for 4,868 listed U.S. organizations from 1990 to 2010. Our results provide evidence of four, rather than three, organizational performance dimensions. Stock market performance and growth are confirmed as separate dimensions, whereas accounting returns must be decomposed into profitability and liquidity dimensions. Robustness analyses indicate stability of our inferences for three dissimilar industries and for a period of 21 years but reveal that organizational performance dimensions underlie dynamics during years in which environmental instability is high. Our study provides an initial contribution to the clarification of the important organizational performance construct by defining four dimensions and validating indicators for each dimension. Thus, we provide essential groundwork for the measurement of organizational performance in future empirical studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 · Cited by 6,691
Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050306 · Cited by 3,337
Understanding the Impact of Convergent Validity on Research Results
Carlson, K. D., & Herdman, A. O. (2012) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428110392383 · Cited by 642 · cited 4×
“First, we identify a number of OP indicators that have been used in prior empirical studies, as reviewed by Combs et al. (2005) and Richard et al. (2009). These indicators are typically ratios that measure accounting returns. Accounting returns ratios consist of a numerator that expresses the accounting outcome and a…”
InfluentialBisbe, J., Batista-Foguet, J.-M., & Chenhall, R. (2007) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.010 · Cited by 422
Cited by
An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity
Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120968614 · Cited by 1,309
Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital
Ng, A. C., & Rezaee, Z. (2015) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.08.003 · Cited by 650
Trumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1900 · Cited by 543
Self-citationWhat is strategic leadership? Developing a framework for future research
Samimi, M., Cortes, A. F., Anderson, M. H., & Herrmann, P. (2022) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101353 · Cited by 328
Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses
Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Aranda-Usón, A., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2020) · Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal · doi:10.1108/sampj-04-2019-0150 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamann, P. M., Schiemann, F., Bellora, L., & Guenther, T. W.
- Venue
- Organizational Research Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-87
- ISSN
- 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7425
- OpenAlex
- W3124789366
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 25.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the Dimensions of Organizational Performance: A Construct Validity Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1094428112470007
- The paper
- Hamann, P. M., Schiemann, F., Bellora, L., & Guenther, T. W. (2013). Exploring the Dimensions of Organizational Performance: A Construct Validity Study. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.