The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transformative Service Research: Advancing Our Knowledge About Service and Well-Being
Open accessAbstract
As humans and consumers, we spend much of our time immersed in an array of services and service systems (e.g., telecommunications, education, financial, government, and health care) that affect almost every aspect of our lives. Our continuous connection with and usage of services and the implications they have for our lives go far beyond questions related to traditional service dependent measures such as service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty. Service fundamentally affects our lives and our well-being as individuals, employees, families, and communities. Given this, we are honored to be the guest coeditors for this special issue on transformative service research (TSR). First conceptualized by Anderson (2010), today we regard TSR as any research, regardless of academic discipline, that, at its core, investigates the relationship between service and well-being. More specifically, TSR represents research that focuses on creating ‘‘uplifting changes’’ aimed at improving the lives of individuals (both consumers and employees), families, communities, society, and the ecosystem more broadly (Anderson et al. 2013). What distinguishes TSR from other service work is often the outcomes under investigation. With TSR, indicators of both increasing and decreasing well-being take center stage. These metrics may focus on assessing aspects of well-being, such as physical health (objective and subjective perceptions), mental health (e.g., resilience, stress, and burnout), financial wellbeing, discrimination, marginalization, literacy, inclusion, access, capacity building, and decreased disparity among others (Anderson et al. 2013; Rosenbaum et al. 2011). Although the term ‘‘transformative service research’’ is relatively new, prior service, consumer, and marketing research has emphasized service and well-being. In a review we undertook to examine prior research that we considered TSR (see Ostrom, Mathras, and Anderson 2014), we identified eight TSRrelated themes—cocreation, employee well-being, vulnerable consumers, social support, access, service literacy, service design, and service systems—highlighting the breadth of research that has investigated service and well-being. Since TSR was spotlighted as a research priority by Ostrom et al. (2010; i.e., ‘‘Improving Well-Being through Transformative Service’’), there has been increased interest in the service community in undertaking research that examines the intersection of service and well-being. Research has attempted to better conceptualize the domain (e.g., Anderson et al. 2013; Rosenbaum et al. 2011) as well as tackle important service-related issues centered on well-being (e.g., how organization socialization can promote coproduction behaviors that influence financial well-being [Guo et al. 2013]; how systemic restricted choice related to financial services affects minority business owners [Bone, Christensen, and Williams 2014]; customer healthoriented cocreation practice styles [McColl-Kennedy et al. 2012]). In the most recent service research priority-setting effort completed by Ostrom et al. (2015), not only was ‘‘Improving Well-Being through Transformative Service’’ spotlighted again as a research priority based on input from 23 roundtable discussions conducted by 19 different service centers/networks located around the world, but, in a global survey of academic service researchers, it was ranked as the most important of the 12 identified priorities by the largest percentage of respondents. Given the interest of the service research community, we hope that the emerging, interdisciplinary subfield of service, TSR, will lead to the investigation of important but understudied service contexts and issues and that it will be inclusive of diversity of discipline and method/approach as well as the unit of analysis, focusing not only on individuals but on collectives as well. In addition, we hope that the term ‘‘transformative service research’’ itself will make it easier to identify service research that makes contributions to our understanding of well-being. As we discuss subsequently, we want the impact of TSR to go beyond publications to measurable positive improvements in the lives of consumers. To advance these objectives, our goals for
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/586910 · Cited by 3,409
Stress and Health: Major Findings and Policy Implications
Thoits, P. A. (2010) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/0022146510383499 · Cited by 1,967
Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context
Ostrom, A. L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D. E., Patrício, L., & Voss, C. A. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670515576315 · Cited by 1,469
Self-citationEmbodiment: a conceptual glossary for epidemiology
Krieger, N. (2005) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2004.024562 · Cited by 964
Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N. P., Lehrner, A., Desarnaud, F., Bader, H. N., Makotkine, I., Flory, J. D., Bierer, L. M., & Meaney, M. J. (2014) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13121571 · Cited by 514
Bierer, L. M., Bader, H. N., Daskalakis, N. P., Lehrner, A. L., Makotkine, I., Seckl, J. R., & Yehuda, R. (2014) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.06.001 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Customer experience challenges: Bringing together digital, physical and social realms
Bolton, R. N., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Cheung, L., Gallan, A., Orsingher, C., Witell, L., & Zaki, M. (2018) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2018-0113 · Cited by 849
The Internet-of-Things: Review and research directions
Ng, I. C. L., & Wakenshaw, S. Y. L. (2017) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.003 · Cited by 621
The customer value proposition: evolution, development, and application in marketing
Payne, A., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0523-z · Cited by 440
Design for service inclusion: Creating inclusive service systems by 2050
Fisk, R. P., Dean, A. M., Alkire (née Nasr), L., Joubert, A., Previte, J., Robertson, N., & Rosenbaum, M. S. (2018) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2018-0121 · Cited by 354
Service Research Priorities: Designing Sustainable Service Ecosystems
Field, J. M., Fotheringham, D., Subramony, M., Gustafsson, A., Ostrom, A. L., Lemon, K. N., Huang, M.-H., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2021) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705211031302 · Cited by 202
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, L., & Ostrom, A. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Service Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-07-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 243-249
- ISSN
- 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7379
- OpenAlex
- W2118641154
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 6
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transformative Service Research: Advancing Our Knowledge About Service and Well-Being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1094670515591316
- The paper
- Anderson, L., & Ostrom, A. L. (2015). Transformative Service Research: Advancing Our Knowledge About Service and Well-Being. Journal of Service Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670515591316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.