The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expectation Processes in Satisfaction Formation: A Field Study
Abstract
Expectations of a novel restaurant dining experience were manipulated in a controlled field setting to test for the role and persistence of expectation and expectation-related effects within the expectancy disconfirmation and performance model. In an effort to ensure external validity, preconsumption expectations were manipulated via real-appearing reviews, actual service experience was recorded through protocol methods, and postconsumption perceptions were measured in the immediate postusage period. Results showed that the expectation manipulation and the expectations thereby created had an immediate but declining effect over the consumption period, that expectations acted as forward assimilation agents for performance, that retrospective expectations were partially influenced by performance observations in the manner of backward assimilation, that expectation-initiated performance comparisons (disconfirmation) and performance judgments were important satisfaction influences, and that the expectancy disconfirmation model is dimension-specific with regard to operation of its components. These findings shed insight into the operation of expectations, performance, and disconfirmation in service environments and illustrate some effects of consumption tracking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Self-citationAn Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction
Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151722 · Cited by 2,914
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211 · Cited by 2,094
Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298905300202 · Cited by 2,084
Self-citationDefensive Marketing Strategy by Customer Complaint Management: A Theoretical Analysis
Fornell, C., & Wernerfelt, B. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378702400401 · Cited by 1,395
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208812 · Cited by 1,344
Cited by
Maxham, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.4.57.18512 · Cited by 1,204
An Empirical Investigation of Customer Satisfaction after Service Failure and Recovery
McCollough, M. A., Berry, L. L., & Yadav, M. S. (2000) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/109467050032002 · Cited by 1,029
Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2009) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0188 · Cited by 990
The leniency of return policy and consumers' repurchase intention in online retailing
Wang, Y., Anderson, J., Joo, S.-J., & Huscroft, J. R. (2019) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-01-2019-0016 · Cited by 80
Service recovery by AI or human agents: Do failure and strategy context matter?
Fürst, A., Trißler, L., Friedrich, R., & Wirtz, J. (2025) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-04-2024-0190 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, R. L., & Burke, R. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Service Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 196-214
- ISSN
- 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7379
- OpenAlex
- W2117260320
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expectation Processes in Satisfaction Formation: A Field Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/109467059913002
- The paper
- Oliver, R. L., & Burke, R. R. (1999). Expectation Processes in Satisfaction Formation: A Field Study. Journal of Service Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467059913002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.