Cited by 990Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration

Kim, Dan J., Ferrin, Donald L., Rao, H. Raghav·2009·Information Systems Research

Abstract

Trust and satisfaction are essential ingredients for successful business relationships in business-to-consumer electronic commerce. Yet there is little research on trust and satisfaction in e-commerce that takes a longitudinal approach. Drawing on three primary bodies of literature, the theory of reasoned action, the extended valence framework, and expectation-confirmation theory, this study synthesizes a model of consumer trust and satisfaction in the context of e-commerce. The model considers not only how consumers formulate their prepurchase decisions, but also how they form their long-term relationships with the same website vendor by comparing their prepurchase expectations to their actual purchase outcome. The results indicate that trust directly and indirectly affects a consumer's purchase decision in combination with perceived risk and perceived benefit, and also that trust has a longer term impact on consumer e-loyalty through satisfaction. Thus, this study extends our understanding of consumer Internet transaction behavior as a three-fold (prepurchase, purchase, and postpurchase) process, and it recognizes the crucial, multiple roles that trust plays in this process. Implications for theory and practice as well as limitations and future directions are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.1080.0188

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston - Clear Lake (US)
  • Singapore Management University (SG)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2009-06
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
237-257
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2155791402
Cited by
990
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 44
FWCI
37.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
consumer trust, customer satisfaction, B2C e-commerce, e-loyalty, purchase decision, risk perception, perceived benefits, theory of reasoned action, expectation confirmation theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review