Cited by 141Behavioral and Psychological StudiesSchool Health and Nursing EducationEducation Discipline and Inequality

Improving multitiered systems of support for students with “internalizing” emotional/behavioral problems

Weist, Mark D., Eber, Lucille, Horner, Robert, Splett, Joni, Putnam, Robert, Barrett, Susan, Perales, Kelly, Fairchild, Amanda J. +1 more·2018·Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions

Abstract

A recently defined interconnected systems framework (ISF) provides explicit guidance on steps to align positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) and expanded school mental health (SMH) within the multitiered system of support (MTSS). As PBIS and SMH strategies align, there are opportunities to expand and improve effective programs and services for students at all tiers of the MTSS. A prominent need is to improve programs and services for students presenting “internalizing” disorders such as those related to trauma, depression, and anxiety. In this article, we discuss relevant issues involved in improving multitiered systems/interventions for students presenting internalizing problems and provide guidance for this work in dimensions of cross-system collaboration (with major emphasis on effective teams), implementing evidence-based practices, and data-based decision making/quality improvement. The article concludes with recommendations for practice, research, and policy to improve MTSS for students presenting internalizing problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1098300717753832

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weist, M. D., Eber, L., Horner, R., Splett, J., Putnam, R., Barrett, S., Perales, K., Fairchild, A. J., & Hoover, S.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Midwest Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Network, Lombard, IL, USA
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • May Institute (US)
  • Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network, Towson, MD, USA
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Weist, Mark D.
Venue
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions
Published
2018-02-11
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
172-184
ISSN
  • 1098-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4772
OpenAlex
W2789076444
Cited by
141
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3
FWCI
25.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Justice Programs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
Keywords
multi-tiered systems of support, Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports, internalizing disorders, trauma, depression, anxiety, cross-system collaboration, evidence-based practice, data-driven decision making, quality improvement, school teams

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review