Cited by 26Indigenous Studies and EcologyIndigenous Cultures and HistoryIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

Technology and Inuit identity: Facebook use by Inuit youth

Castleton, Alexander·2018·AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples

Abstract

This article discusses the relationship between technology and Inuit identity. Using interviews, it explores how a group of students from the Arctic College located in the community of Iqaluit in the Canadian Arctic, use the social network Facebook. It was found that in addition to an expected use of the social network associated with the script promoted by the technology, Inuit youth used Facebook to access content related to their identity in various groups, discuss sociocultural issues, and remember traditions. This article argues that Inuit identity is an example of how indigenous cultures have to be understood as something dynamic, constantly changing, for which information and communication technologies are fundamental. Furthermore, this article claims that rather than understanding Facebook as a tool that is adopted by Indigenous people—as previous literature tends to hold—the use of digital media should be conceived as part and parcel of identity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1177180118782993

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have assisted ILR and Indigenous communities in sharing community and cultural knowledge, events, memes and snippets of language.

    “Although social media can have drawbacks and very real negatives such as cyber bullying and cyber racism, platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have assisted ILR and Indigenous communities in sharing community and cultural knowledge, events, memes and snippets of language (Castleton, 2018; Rice et al., 2016).”
  • Stereotypes that confine Indigenous Peoples to a specific place, time and land perpetuate a museological context.

    “Stereotypes like this perpetuate a museological context (Castleton 2018);”

Authors
Castleton, A.
Affiliations
Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Castleton, Alexander
Venue
AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples
Published
2018-06-27
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
228-236
ISSN
  • 1174-1740 (ISSN-L)
  • 1177-1801
OpenAlex
W2810566242
Cited by
26
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples (publishedVersion)
Funders
Northern Science Training Program
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
Inuit identity, Facebook, social media use, Inuit youth, digital media, indigenous identity, socio-cultural issues, cultural memory, Iqaluit, information and communication technologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review