Technology and Inuit identity: Facebook use by Inuit youth
Abstract
This article discusses the relationship between technology and Inuit identity. Using interviews, it explores how a group of students from the Arctic College located in the community of Iqaluit in the Canadian Arctic, use the social network Facebook. It was found that in addition to an expected use of the social network associated with the script promoted by the technology, Inuit youth used Facebook to access content related to their identity in various groups, discuss sociocultural issues, and remember traditions. This article argues that Inuit identity is an example of how indigenous cultures have to be understood as something dynamic, constantly changing, for which information and communication technologies are fundamental. Furthermore, this article claims that rather than understanding Facebook as a tool that is adopted by Indigenous people—as previous literature tends to hold—the use of digital media should be conceived as part and parcel of identity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have assisted ILR and Indigenous communities in sharing community and cultural knowledge, events, memes and snippets of language.
“Although social media can have drawbacks and very real negatives such as cyber bullying and cyber racism, platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have assisted ILR and Indigenous communities in sharing community and cultural knowledge, events, memes and snippets of language (Castleton, 2018; Rice et al., 2016).”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Castleton, 2018
Stereotypes that confine Indigenous Peoples to a specific place, time and land perpetuate a museological context.
“Stereotypes like this perpetuate a museological context (Castleton 2018);”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Castleton 2018
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364 · see citing works
Animal Rights, Human Rights: Ecology, Economy, and Ideology in the Canadian Arctic
Wenzel, G. (1991) · doi:10.3138/9781442670877 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization
Meighan, P. J. (2021) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801211037672 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Li, J., & Brar, A. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106988 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Castleton, A.
- Affiliations
- Carleton University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Castleton, Alexander
- ORCID
- Castleton, Alexander
- Venue
- AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-06-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 228-236
- ISSN
- 1174-1740 (ISSN-L)
- 1177-1801
- OpenAlex
- W2810566242
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AlterNative An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Northern Science Training Program
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- Inuit identity, Facebook, social media use, Inuit youth, digital media, indigenous identity, socio-cultural issues, cultural memory, Iqaluit, information and communication technologies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review