Students’ motivation to study music: The United States of America
Abstract
As a part of a larger international mapping exercise to examine students’ motivation to study music as compared to other school subjects, this article draws upon data from a sample of 3037 students in the USA to observe perceptions of values, competence and interest in music study (in school versus outside of school) among music learners and non-music learners. Students were grouped into three grade levels: (a) 6, (b) 7—9, and (c) 10—12. Music learners in the USA had significantly higher motivational profiles for music and some other school subjects as compared to non-music learners. Music interest inside of school was ranked significantly lower than for any other subject, while music interest outside of school was ranked second highest for any subject in grades 6 and 7—9, and highest of all subjects in grades 10—12. This article addresses cultural and contextual issues in the USA to consider how music advocates might better demonstrate the importance and usefulness of music study as an academic course. Practical recommendations include encouraging a broader emphasis beyond performance and competition, and promoting opportunities for autonomous music learning within the school setting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students generally hold positive attitudes toward music activity.
“Students generally hold positive attitudes toward music activity (McPherson & Hendricks, 2010).”
From Understanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review (2020) · cites this paper as McPherson & Hendricks, 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A PRISMA review of expectancy-value theory in music contexts
Sin, H. X., Tan, L., & McPherson, G. E. (2022) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/03057356211024344 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding Participation in Secondary Music Classes: A Literature Review
Pendergast, S. (2020) · Update: Applications of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/8755123320928479 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Luo, N., & Guan, T. (2025) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/00224294241257154 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Enjoyment of music and GCSE uptake: survey findings from three North East schools in England
Whitford, H., & Kokotsaki, D. (2024) · British Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1017/s0265051723000438 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- McPherson, G. E., & Hendricks, K. S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- McPherson, Gary E.
- Venue
- Research Studies in Music Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-213
- ISSN
- 1321-103X (ISSN-L)
- 1834-5530
- OpenAlex
- W2151456915
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 61.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Research Studies in Music Education (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NAMM Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Music Education and Analysis
- Keywords
- music learning motivation, music education, student motivation, music interest, perceived competence, values, self-directed learning, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review