The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reflexive Dialogical Practice in Management Learning
Abstract
Recent criticisms of management education have raised the need for a critical pedagogy in management studies but have rarely evaluated the possible implications for management learning and practice. Drawing from critical and social constructionist perspectives, I propose we need to ground critique by incorporating reflexive dialogical practice in management learning as a way of developing more critical and responsive practitioners. Specifically, I reconstruct learning as reflective/reflexive dialogue in which participants connect tacit knowing and explicit knowledge. From this perspective, both educators and learners need to take a critical view of their dialogical practices and what may constitute `good' learning conversations. I include examples from my attempts to incorporate this approach in my own teaching practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Cited by
Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria
O'donovan *, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/1356251042000216642 · Cited by 300
The formation of germ cell for organizational learning
Ivaldi, S., & Scaratti, G. (2016) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/jwl-01-2016-0004 · Cited by 16
Using Focused Conversation in the Classroom
Spee, J. C. (2005) · Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1177/1052562905277969 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Cunliffe, A. L.
- Venue
- Management Learning
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-61
- ISSN
- 1350-5076 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7307
- OpenAlex
- W2011426870
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.