Developing Absorptive Capacity in Mature Organizations: The Change Agent’s Role
Abstract
A considerable amount of research into how organizations absorb new knowledge was prompted by the work of Cohen and Levinthal. In a recent literature review Zahra and George identify two distinct elements of absorptive capacity (potential and realized). This article contributes to the study of managerial agency in the absorption of new knowledge and skills. Zahra and George’s model is extended to incorporate key roles associated with knowledge transfer, including gatekeepers, boundary spanners and change agents. Empirical data are drawn from a longitudinal study of a mature manufacturing firm based in North Wales. Change was initiated by the owner in response to the loss of the company’s major customer—the Ministry of Defence. The main change agent was a recently recruited middle manager who used his mass production experience to improve managerial communications and introduce more efficient working practices to the shopfloor.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ability to change can find expression in the successful use of so-called change agents.
“Furthermore, the ability to change can find expression in the successful use of so-called ''change agents'', which accompany the change and implementation process and, if necessary, have intervention methods and options (Jones 2006).”
From Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization (2020) · cites this paper as Jones 2006
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · see citing works
Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
Szulanski, G. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171105 · Cited by 7,839 · see citing works
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477 · see citing works
EFFECTS OF AGE AT ENTRY , KNOWLEDGE INTENSITY, AND IMITABILITY ON INTERNATIONAL GROWTH.
Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556419 · Cited by 2,748 · see citing works
Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(99)00054-3 · Cited by 1,235 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization
Duchek, S. (2020) · Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 · Cited by 2,027 · see citing works
“Furthermore, the ability to change can find expression in the successful use of so-called ‘‘change agents’’, which accompany the change and implementation process and, if necessary, have intervention methods and options (Jones 2006).”
BackgroundIslands of Practice: Conflict and a Lack of ‘Community’ in Situated Learning
Macpherson, A., & Clark, B. (2009) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507609340810 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jones, O.
- Affiliations
- Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Oswald
- ORCID
- Jones, Oswald
- Venue
- Management Learning
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 355-376
- ISSN
- 1350-5076 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7307
- OpenAlex
- W2080491535
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Management Learning (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Food and Drug Safety
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Keywords
- absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer, managerial agency, mature organizations, change agents, boundary spanners, gatekeepers, knowledge absorption, organizational change, manufacturing companies, management communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review